Effect of postactivation potentation on dynamic knee extension performance

Six men and four women performed, in separate trials, maximal dynamic kinee extensions with loads of 15%, 30%, 45% and 60% of maximal isometric knee extension peak torque (MVC). The dynamic extensions were done after postactivation potentiation (PAP) had been induced with a 10-s MVC, and in a contro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of applied physiology Vol. 83; no. 6
Main Authors Roderich, Gossen E, Sale, D G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.12.2000
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1439-6319

Cover

More Information
Summary:Six men and four women performed, in separate trials, maximal dynamic kinee extensions with loads of 15%, 30%, 45% and 60% of maximal isometric knee extension peak torque (MVC). The dynamic extensions were done after postactivation potentiation (PAP) had been induced with a 10-s MVC, and in a control trial without PAP. PAP, measured as the increased in evoked twitch torque, was 53 (4%) (SE) and 43 (3%) at the time of the first and second extensions with each load. PAP failed to increase the attained peak velocity with any load; on the contrary, there was a trend for peak velocity to decrease in the first extension, which occurred approx 15s after the 10-s MVC. The results suggest that fatigue produced by the 10-s MVC suppressed any benefit that could be derived from the induced PAP. A surface electromyogram (EMG) recorded from one muscle of quadriceps femoris gave no indication of activation failure in the first knee extension; however, activation impairment specific to the rate of force development cannot be ruled out. It is concluded that the strategy employed, namely of having knee extensions performed soon after the 10-s MVC to maximise PAP at the time of performance, was unsuccessful because there had been insufficient time for recovery from fatigue. It is possible that a longer recovery time, even at the cost of a diminished PAP, may have proved beneficial.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1439-6319