Editors’ Introduction

This essay explores several key themes regarding political imprisonment and confinement. Neither governments nor activists agree on who is and who is not a political prisoner. Governments routinely deny they imprison people for political reasons. Instead, they consistently seek to criminalize those...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadical history review no. 146; p. 1
Main Authors Goulding, Marc, Meade, Teresa, Power, Margaret
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Duke University Press, NC & IL 01.05.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0163-6545
1534-1453
DOI10.1215/01636545-10302793

Cover

More Information
Summary:This essay explores several key themes regarding political imprisonment and confinement. Neither governments nor activists agree on who is and who is not a political prisoner. Governments routinely deny they imprison people for political reasons. Instead, they consistently seek to criminalize those they detain as part of their effort to maintain the legitimacy of their rule and delegitimize those who act against it. A common definition of who is and who is not a political prisoner does not exist among prisoners, activists, or supporters. No international organizations or national bodies have developed a shared description of what constitutes a political prisoner. Instead, as this essay and the articles that follow illustrate, the subject is a matter of debate and discussion.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0163-6545
1534-1453
DOI:10.1215/01636545-10302793