A Test of Dynamic Consistency and Consequentialism in the Presence of Ambiguity
We test dynamic consistency and consequentialism, two key principles of dynamic decision making under ambiguity and relate violations of these principles to subjectsÕ ambiguity at- titudes. In our experiment, subjects received a signal which made it attractive for ambiguity averse subjects to deviat...
Saved in:
| Published in | IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Paper |
| Language | English |
| Published |
St. Louis
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
01.01.2018
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
| Summary: | We test dynamic consistency and consequentialism, two key principles of dynamic decision making under ambiguity and relate violations of these principles to subjectsÕ ambiguity at- titudes. In our experiment, subjects received a signal which made it attractive for ambiguity averse subjects to deviate from their ex- ante contingent plan and violate dynamic consistency. We found that ambiguity averse subjects were indeed more likely to violate dynamic consistency than ambiguity neutral subjects, but not consequentialism. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | content type line 50 SourceType-Working Papers-1 ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1 |