전립선비대증에 대한 경요도 전립선 절제술과 경요도 레이저 전립선기화술의 비교

• Published in: The world journal of men's health pp. 42 - 48
• Main Authors: 강승철, 박세홍, 윤덕기, 문두건, 함병국, 고기원
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Korean
• Published: 대한남성과학회 01.04.2009
• Subjects: 비뇨기과학
• ISSN: 2287-4208; 2287-4690

Purpose: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard for the surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the procedure’s limitations are its invasiveness and the high prevalence of complications. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using an 80w high power potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser has recently been developed as a less invasive treatment. We assessed the efficacy of PVP as an alternative to TURP for the treatment of BPH. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 324 patients who were surgically treated for BPH from July 2005 to December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 324 patients, 190 patients of Group I were treated by TURP and 134 patients of Group II were treated by PVP. Before treatment, assessing the serum PSA level transrectal ultrasound and urodynamic study were done. The primary efficacy parameters were the postoperative international prostatic symptom score and the uroflow parametersat 6 months after the operation. The secondary efficacy parameters were perioperative factors such as the duration of the hospital stay, the operative time and the catheter-indwelling period. Any adverse reactions were monitored. Results: There was no significant difference in the basal characteristics of the study subjects between both the groups. The primary efficacy parameters, the IPSS, the Qmax and thepostvoid residual urine volume were significantly improved in both groups, but there were no significant differences between both the groups. In group II, the perioperative parameters such as the operation time, the hospitalization day and the catheter-indwelling periodwere significantly shorter than those of group I (p<0.05). But the urethral complications such as urethral stricture, dysuria and bladder neck contracture were more common in group II. Conclusions: These results suggest that PVP using an 80w high power KTP could be an alternative for TURP in terms of efficacy. For the general, safe use of PVP, PVP should be carefully done until the causes of the urethral complications of PVP are determined. KCI Citation Count: 0