Prediction of intimal tear site by computed tomography findings in acute type A dissection

• Published in: Korean circulation journal pp. 48 - 55
• Main Authors: 김준성, 박계현, 임청, 김동진, 정요천, 신윤철, 최상일, 전은주, 유진영
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 대한심장학회 01.01.2016
• Subjects: 내과학
• ISSN: 1738-5520; 1738-5555
• DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.1.48

Background and Objectives: Preoperative identification of intimal tear site in acute type A dissection will help procedural planning. The objective of this study was to determine the key findings of computed tomography (CT)-based prediction for tear site and compare the accuracy between radiologists and surgeons. Subjects and Methods: Multi-detector CT (MDCT) images from 50 patients who underwent surgical repair of type A aortic dissection were retrospectively reviewed by 4 cardiac surgeons with limited experience or by 3 radiologists specialized in cardiovascular imaging. Surgical findings of intimal tear site were used as references. Results: In surgical findings, the locations of intimal tear that were identified in 43 patients included aorta (n=25), ascending with arch (n=7), and arch only (n=11). The rest were retrograde dissections from the tear of descending aorta. Key CT findings that were most frequently found were defect in the intimal flap shadow (30.0±4.0 patients/reviewer, accuracy 87.0±11.7%) and differential filling of false lumen by phase and location (9.4±2.9 patients/reviewer, 84.8±10.4%). Surgeons predicted tear site (75.0±7.7% vs. 86.7±1.2%, p=0.055) and specified flap defect (80.5±10.3% vs. 95.7±7.4%, p=0.073) with lower accuracy than radiologists. Conclusions: With MDCT imaging, well-educated surgeons could be accurate in three fourths of cases. There was room for improvement through experience. Considering the substantial possibility of inaccuracy, critical decisions on CT images should be made through thorough reviewing by as many experienced radiologists and surgeons as possible. KCI Citation Count: 2