小于胎龄儿幼儿期生活质量及其影响因素的研究

目的了解小于胎龄儿（SGA）幼儿期的生活质量与适于胎龄儿（AGA）比较是否存在差异,并调查影响SGA生活质量的因素。方法采用婴幼儿生活质量问卷表（ITQOL SF-47）对儿保门诊就诊的出生时为SGA和AGA的1~3岁幼儿进行生活质量调查,分别比较SGA组（n=203）与AGA组（n=130）、SGA追赶组（n=119）与无追赶组（n=84）、SGA首次儿保随访组（n=144）与多次儿保随访组（n=59）的生活质量。采用广义线性模型分析法调查影响SGA生活质量的因素。结果 SGA组ITQOL总分低于AGA组（630±99 vs 716±84,P〈0.05）;SGA无追赶组的ITQOL总分低于追...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国当代儿科杂志 Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 355 - 360
Main Author 杨琴 张萱 程茜
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 2016
Subjects
儿童
小于胎龄儿
幼儿期
生活质量
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1008-8830

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的了解小于胎龄儿（SGA）幼儿期的生活质量与适于胎龄儿（AGA）比较是否存在差异,并调查影响SGA生活质量的因素。方法采用婴幼儿生活质量问卷表（ITQOL SF-47）对儿保门诊就诊的出生时为SGA和AGA的1~3岁幼儿进行生活质量调查,分别比较SGA组（n=203）与AGA组（n=130）、SGA追赶组（n=119）与无追赶组（n=84）、SGA首次儿保随访组（n=144）与多次儿保随访组（n=59）的生活质量。采用广义线性模型分析法调查影响SGA生活质量的因素。结果 SGA组ITQOL总分低于AGA组（630±99 vs 716±84,P〈0.05）;SGA无追赶组的ITQOL总分低于追赶组（602±96 vs 649±97,P〈0.05）;SGA首次儿保随访组的ITQOL总分低于多次儿保随访组（616±94 vs 657±107,P〈0.05）。广义线性模型分析显示,有追赶生长、多次儿保随访、女性、母亲文化程度高以及居住在重庆主城区的SGA幼儿ITQOL总分高（P〈0.05）。结论 SGA幼儿期的生活质量低于同龄正常儿童。适当促进追赶生长及定期儿童保健对提高SGA的生活质量有益;儿童性别、居住地、母亲文化程度对SGA幼儿期的生活质量也有影响。
Bibliography:Quality of life; Early childhood; Small for gestational age; Child
Objective To investigate the difference in quality of life（QOL） between small for gestational age（SGA） and appropriate for gestational age（AGA） infants during early childhood, and to investigate the factors influcing the QOL. Methods The Infant and Toddler Quality of Life Questionnaire-47（ITQOL-SF47） was used to investigate the QOL of 1 to 3-year-old children born SGA and AGA who visited the child health care division. QOL was compared between SGA（n=203） and AGA groups（n=130）, between the catch-up（n=119） and no-catch-up subgroups（n=84） of children born SGA, and between the single healthcare（n=144） and multiple healthcare subgroups（n=59） of children born SGA. The generalized linear model was used to investigate the factors influencing the QOL. Results The total ITQOL score of the SGA group was significantly lower than that of the AGA group（630±99 vs 716±84; P〈0.05）. In children born SGA, the no-catch-up subgroup had a significantly lower total I
ISSN:1008-8830