Trusta: Reasoning about Assurance Cases with Formal Methods and Large Language Models
Assurance cases can be used to argue for the safety of products in safety engineering. In safety-critical areas, the construction of assurance cases is indispensable. Trustworthiness Derivation Trees (TDTs) enhance assurance cases by incorporating formal methods, rendering it possible for automatic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors | , , |
|---|---|
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
22.09.2023
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.2309.12941 |
Cover
| Summary: | Assurance cases can be used to argue for the safety of products in safety
engineering. In safety-critical areas, the construction of assurance cases is
indispensable. Trustworthiness Derivation Trees (TDTs) enhance assurance cases
by incorporating formal methods, rendering it possible for automatic reasoning
about assurance cases. We present Trustworthiness Derivation Tree Analyzer
(Trusta), a desktop application designed to automatically construct and verify
TDTs. The tool has a built-in Prolog interpreter in its backend, and is
supported by the constraint solvers Z3 and MONA. Therefore, it can solve
constraints about logical formulas involving arithmetic, sets, Horn clauses
etc. Trusta also utilizes large language models to make the creation and
evaluation of assurance cases more convenient. It allows for interactive human
examination and modification. We evaluated top language models like
ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and PaLM 2 for generating assurance cases. Our tests
showed a 50%-80% similarity between machine-generated and human-created cases.
In addition, Trusta can extract formal constraints from text in natural
languages, facilitating an easier interpretation and validation process. This
extraction is subject to human review and correction, blending the best of
automated efficiency with human insight. To our knowledge, this marks the first
integration of large language models in automatic creating and reasoning about
assurance cases, bringing a novel approach to a traditional challenge. Through
several industrial case studies, Trusta has proven to quickly find some subtle
issues that are typically missed in manual inspection, demonstrating its
practical value in enhancing the assurance case development process. |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2309.12941 |