Best approximations of non-linear mappings: Method of optimal injections
While the theory of operator approximation with any given accuracy is well elaborated, the theory of {best constrained} constructive operator approximation is still not so well developed. Despite increasing demands from applications this subject is hardly tractable because of intrinsic difficulties...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Main Authors | , | 
|---|---|
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
          
        07.11.2018
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| DOI | 10.48550/arxiv.1811.03125 | 
Cover
| Summary: | While the theory of operator approximation with any given accuracy is well
elaborated, the theory of {best constrained} constructive operator
approximation is still not so well developed. Despite increasing demands from
applications this subject is hardly tractable because of intrinsic difficulties
in associated approximation techniques. This paper concerns the best
constrained approximation of a non-linear operator in probability spaces. We
propose and justify a new approach and technique based on the following
observation. Methods for best approximation are aimed at obtaining the best
solution within a certain class; the accuracy of the solution is limited by the
extent to which the class is suitable.
By contrast, iterative methods are normally convergent but the convergence
can be quite slow. Moreover, in practice only a finite number of iteration
loops can be carried out and therefore, the final approximate solution is often
unsatisfactorily inaccurate. A natural idea is to combine the methods for best
approximation and iterative techniques to exploit their advantageous features.
Here, we present an approach which realizes this.
The proposed approximating operator has several degrees of freedom to
minimize the associated error. In particular, one of the specific features of
the approximating technique we develop is special random vectors called
injections. They are determined in the way that allows us to further minimize
the associated error. | 
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1811.03125 |