I don’t care, I don’t know … I know too much! On Incompleteness and Undecidedness in Abstract Argumentation
Incompleteness and undecidedness are pervasively present in human reasoning activities and make the definition of the relevant computational models challenging. In this discussion paper we focus on one such model, namely abstract argumentation frameworks, and examine several flavours of incompletene...
Saved in:
| Published in | Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation pp. 265 - 280 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Book Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
| Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISBN | 9783319147253 3319147250 |
| ISSN | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_18 |
Cover
| Summary: | Incompleteness and undecidedness are pervasively present in human reasoning activities and make the definition of the relevant computational models challenging. In this discussion paper we focus on one such model, namely abstract argumentation frameworks, and examine several flavours of incompleteness and undecidedness thereof, by providing a conceptual analysis, a critical literature review, and some new ideas with pointers to future research. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 9783319147253 3319147250 |
| ISSN: | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_18 |