1070; A Systematic Review of Seymour Fracture Management

Aim Seymour fractures are distal phalanx fractures of the finger in children with a juxta-epiphyseal or Salter-Harris Type I/II pattern associated with a nail-bed injury. There remains a paucity in literature regarding the development of complications between Seymour fracture management options, wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of surgery Vol. 108
Main Authors Khanal, P, Srivastava, A, Zargaran, D, Zargaran, A, Nikkhah, D, Mosahebi, A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-1323
1365-2168
1365-2168
DOI10.1093/bjs/znab259.946

Cover

More Information
Summary:Aim Seymour fractures are distal phalanx fractures of the finger in children with a juxta-epiphyseal or Salter-Harris Type I/II pattern associated with a nail-bed injury. There remains a paucity in literature regarding the development of complications between Seymour fracture management options, with early studies encouraging non-operative management due to the increased rates of post-operative infection. This systematic review aims to identify present-day, optimal management strategies for Seymour fractures, with further analysis of infection rates and secondary outcomes during post-operative recovery. Method Free-text search, MeSH terms and expanded keywords/phrases were employed to search the PubMed, Embase (via Ovid), Web of Science and CINAHL databases. Studies that described the management of Seymour fractures in paediatric patients were included, subject to inclusion/exclusion criteria. The data extracted included the sample size, intervention, infection rates and secondary outcomes. Results An initial search identified 305 articles, following the PRISMA guidance, 8 studies were eligible for full-text analysis. Across all studies, 307 Seymour fractures were identified (mean age, 10±1.2 years). A cross-study analysis showed a lower rate of adverse outcomes (including malunion/non-union and unplanned operative intervention) for K-wire fixation when compared to external splinting, 8.3% and 20.7% (P ≤ 0.001), respectively. Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference between non-operative and operative management in rates of infection and adverse outcomes. However, further analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of complications in patients who received K-wire fixation when compared to external splinting. Nonetheless, further studies with greater levels of evidence need to be carried out to consolidate this.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
1365-2168
DOI:10.1093/bjs/znab259.946