An Easily Accessible Web-Based Minimization Random Allocation System for Clinical Trials

Background: Minimization as an adaptive allocation technique has been recommended in the literature for use in randomized clinical trials. However, it remains uncommonly used due in part to a lack of easily accessible implementation tools. Objective: To provide clinical tria lists with a robust, fle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical Internet research Vol. 15; no. 7; p. np
Main Authors Xiao, Lan, Huang, Qiwen, Yank, Veronica, Ma, Jun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Toronto Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor 01.01.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1438-8871
1438-8871
DOI10.2196/jmir.2405

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Minimization as an adaptive allocation technique has been recommended in the literature for use in randomized clinical trials. However, it remains uncommonly used due in part to a lack of easily accessible implementation tools. Objective: To provide clinical tria lists with a robust, flexible, and readily accessible tool for implementing cova riate-adaptiv biased-coin randomization. Methods: We developed a Web-based random allocation system, MinimRan, that applies Pocock-Sim (for trials with 2 O more arms) and 2-way (currently limited to 2-arm trials) minimization methods for trials using only categorical prognostic factors or the symmetric Kullback-Leibler divergence minimization method for trials (currently limited to 2-arm trials) using continuous prognostic factors with or without categorical factors, in covariate-adaptive biased-coin randomization. Results: In this paper, we describe the systemʼs essential statistical and computer programming features and provide as a example the randomization results generated by it in a recently completed trial. The system can be used in single- and double-blind trials as well as single-center and multicenter trials. Conclusions: We expect the system to facilitate the translation of the 3 validated random allocation methods into broad, efficient clinical research practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1438-8871
1438-8871
DOI:10.2196/jmir.2405