Does Amazon Provide Clarity to Patent Applicants in Canada?

Courts and patent examiners in the US and Canada have struggled with the test for patent subject-matter eligibility of computer-implemented inventions for almost 40 years. This note discusses the US and Canadian situations together because, in practice, Canadian applicants overwhelmingly seek patent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIntellectual property journal Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 125
Main Author Hoicka, Leonora
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Toronto HAB Press Limited 01.12.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0824-7064

Cover

More Information
Summary:Courts and patent examiners in the US and Canada have struggled with the test for patent subject-matter eligibility of computer-implemented inventions for almost 40 years. This note discusses the US and Canadian situations together because, in practice, Canadian applicants overwhelmingly seek patent protection in the US as a complement to Canadian protection, whether or not they seek protection in any other jurisdiction. It would therefore benefit Canadian applicants greatly to have a reasonably clear and consistent expectation of what inventions could at least pass the threshold test for patent-eligible subject-matter in both jurisdictions, whether or not such inventions later stand up to the slightly different approaches to novelty, non-obviousness and sufficiency of disclosure analyses prevailing in the two countries. Amazon has certainly set out the issues in a clear manner, but ultimate clarity arid certainty for patent applicants in Canada may need to wait for a decision from the Federal Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court of Canada.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0824-7064