Does Amazon Provide Clarity to Patent Applicants in Canada?
Courts and patent examiners in the US and Canada have struggled with the test for patent subject-matter eligibility of computer-implemented inventions for almost 40 years. This note discusses the US and Canadian situations together because, in practice, Canadian applicants overwhelmingly seek patent...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Intellectual property journal Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 125 | 
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Toronto
          HAB Press Limited
    
        01.12.2010
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0824-7064 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Courts and patent examiners in the US and Canada have struggled with the test for patent subject-matter eligibility of computer-implemented inventions for almost 40 years. This note discusses the US and Canadian situations together because, in practice, Canadian applicants overwhelmingly seek patent protection in the US as a complement to Canadian protection, whether or not they seek protection in any other jurisdiction. It would therefore benefit Canadian applicants greatly to have a reasonably clear and consistent expectation of what inventions could at least pass the threshold test for patent-eligible subject-matter in both jurisdictions, whether or not such inventions later stand up to the slightly different approaches to novelty, non-obviousness and sufficiency of disclosure analyses prevailing in the two countries. Amazon has certainly set out the issues in a clear manner, but ultimate clarity arid certainty for patent applicants in Canada may need to wait for a decision from the Federal Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court of Canada. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14  | 
| ISSN: | 0824-7064 |