Attitudes on pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatric patients with treatment‐resistant depression
Background Novel technologies make it possible to incorporate pharmacogenetic testing into the medical management of depression. However, previous studies indicate that there may be a subset of subjects who have concerns about genetic testing and may be psychologically vulnerable. If so, pharmacogen...
Saved in:
Published in | Depression and anxiety Vol. 37; no. 9; pp. 842 - 850 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.09.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1091-4269 1520-6394 1520-6394 |
DOI | 10.1002/da.23074 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
Novel technologies make it possible to incorporate pharmacogenetic testing into the medical management of depression. However, previous studies indicate that there may be a subset of subjects who have concerns about genetic testing and may be psychologically vulnerable. If so, pharmacogenetic testing in depressed subjects could negatively impact their mental health and undermine treatment goals.
Methods
In this study, we developed a standardized instrument to assess motivations and attitudes around pharmacogenetic testing in a cohort of 170 depressed Veterans participating in a multi‐center clinic trial.
Results
Testing reveals that subjects were largely positive about the use of genetic testing to guide pharmacological treatment and help plan their future. Most subjects showed only modest concerns about the impact on family, inability to cope with the results, and fear of discrimination. The severity of depression did not predict the concern expressed about negative outcomes. However, non‐Caucasian subjects were more likely on average to endorse concerns about poor coping and fear of discrimination.
Conclusions
These data indicate that while the overall risk is modest, some patients with depression may face psychosocial challenges in the context of pharmacogenetic testing. Future work should identify factors that predict distress and aim to tailor test results to different populations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1091-4269 1520-6394 1520-6394 |
DOI: | 10.1002/da.23074 |