Faster‐acting insulin aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure vs insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Background Faster‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) in a new formulation with additional excipients (L‐arginine and niacinamide). In adults, faster aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure and action vs IAsp. Aim This randomized, double‐blind, 2‐period cro...
Saved in:
Published in | Pediatric diabetes Vol. 18; no. 8; pp. 903 - 910 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Former Munksgaard
John Wiley & Sons A/S
01.12.2017
John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1399-543X 1399-5448 |
DOI | 10.1111/pedi.12506 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
Faster‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) in a new formulation with additional excipients (L‐arginine and niacinamide). In adults, faster aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure and action vs IAsp.
Aim
This randomized, double‐blind, 2‐period crossover trial investigated the pharmacological properties of faster aspart vs IAsp in 12 children (6‐11 years), 13 adolescents (12‐17 years), and 15 adults (18‐64 years) with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Methods
Subjects received 0.2 U/kg subcutaneous dosing (mean of 8.3, 12.8, and 15.6 U, respectively) immediately prior to a standardized meal (17.3 g carbohydrate/100 mL; amount adjusted by body weight).
Results
Consistently across age groups, onset of appearance occurred approximately twice‐as‐fast (5‐7 minutes earlier) and early exposure (AUCIAsp
,0‐30min; area under the IAsp curve from 0 to 30 minutes) was greater (by 78%‐147%) for faster aspart vs IAsp, with no treatment differences in total exposure (AUCIAsp
,0‐t) or maximum concentration (C
max). Two‐hour postmeal plasma glucose excursion was reduced for faster aspart vs IAsp (although only reaching statistical significance in children). In accordance with the absolute dose administered for each age group, AUCIAsp
,0‐t for faster aspart was lower in children (estimated ratio children/adults [95% confidence interval]: 0.59 [0.50;0.69], P < .001) and adolescents (0.78 [0.67;0.90], P = .002) vs adults. No age group differences were seen in C
max (0.91 [0.70;1.17], P = .445, and 0.99 [0.77;1.26], P = .903). The age effect on AUCIAsp
,0‐t and C
max did not differ statistically significantly between treatments. Faster aspart and IAsp were well‐tolerated.
Conclusion
The current findings in children and adolescents suggest a potential for faster aspart to improve postprandial glycemia over current rapid‐acting insulins also in younger age groups. http://ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02035371. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | T1DM average LLOQ C E ΔPG AUC CSII Body mass index 1c RHI U Area under the curve IAsp Time to early 50% of maximum concentration Energy percent Regular human insulin Maximum plasma glucose excursion glycosylated hemoglobin Abbreviations BMI type 1 diabetes mellitus ISPAD Early 50% Cmax max CI HbA Time to maximum concentration Mean plasma glucose excursion Confidence interval t Faster‐acting insulin aspart PG Plasma glucose Insulin aspart Unit(s) American Diabetes Association ADA Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion Lower limit of quantification Maximum concentration Faster aspart International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1399-543X 1399-5448 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pedi.12506 |