Optimal cutoff points for the detection of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome in Mexican adults

To compare the waist circumference cutoff points established by the American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI) with those of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) for the screening of diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome in Mexican adults....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSalud pública de México Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 13 - 19
Main Authors Rojas-Martínez, Rosalba, Aguilar-Salinas, Carlos A, Jiménez-Corona, Aída
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Mexico Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1606-7916
0036-3634
1606-7916
DOI10.1590/S0036-36342012000100003

Cover

More Information
Summary:To compare the waist circumference cutoff points established by the American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI) with those of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) for the screening of diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome in Mexican adults. This study comprised a subsample of the ENSANUT 2006. Subjects without diabetes and hypertension and non-pregnant women were included. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were compared using AUC and the positive likelihood ratio test [LR(+)]. In subjects aged ≥40 years, sensitivity for detection of diabetes and hypertension was higher for the IDF thresholds (85.34 and 86.87%, respectively) compared with those of the AHA/NHLBI (59.49 and 52.41%, respectively). LR(+) were higher for IDF thresholds compared with AHA/NHLBI. Similar results in subjects aged ≥65 years were observed. The measurement of abdominal obesity defined by the IDF was a better screening tool for diabetes and hypertension, considering that initially a high sensitivity and low cost tool at population level is required.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1606-7916
0036-3634
1606-7916
DOI:10.1590/S0036-36342012000100003