XtraLibD: Detecting Irrelevant Third-Party Libraries in Java and Python Applications
Software development comprises the use of multiple Third-Party Libraries (TPLs). However, the irrelevant libraries present in software application’s distributable often lead to excessive consumption of resources such as CPU cycles, memory, and modile-devices’ battery usage. Therefore, the identifica...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering Vol. 1556; pp. 132 - 155 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , | 
| Format | Book Chapter | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Switzerland
          Springer International Publishing AG
    
        2022
     Springer International Publishing  | 
| Series | Communications in Computer and Information Science | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISBN | 303096647X 9783030966478  | 
| ISSN | 1865-0929 1865-0937  | 
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-96648-5_7 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Software development comprises the use of multiple Third-Party Libraries (TPLs). However, the irrelevant libraries present in software application’s distributable often lead to excessive consumption of resources such as CPU cycles, memory, and modile-devices’ battery usage. Therefore, the identification and removal of unused TPLs present in an application are desirable. We present a rapid, storage-efficient, obfuscation-resilient method to detect the irrelevant-TPLs in Java and Python applications. Our approach’s novel aspects are i) Computing a vector representation of a .class file using a model that we call Lib2Vec. The Lib2Vec model is trained using the Paragraph Vector Algorithm. ii) Before using it for training the Lib2Vec models, a .class file is converted to a normalized form via semantics-preserving transformations. iii) A eXtraLibrary Detector (XtraLibD) developed and tested with 27 different language-specific Lib2Vec models. These models were trained using different parameters and >30,000 .class and >478,000 .py files taken from >100 different Java libraries and 43,711 Python available at MavenCentral.com and Pypi.com, respectively. XtraLibD achieves an accuracy of 99.48% with an F1 score of 0.968 and outperforms the existing tools, viz., LibScout, LiteRadar, and LibD with an accuracy improvement of 74.5%, 30.33%, and 14.1%, respectively. Compared with LibD, XtraLibD achieves a response time improvement of 61.37% and a storage reduction of 87.93% (99.85% over JIngredient). Our program artifacts are available at https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5179747. | 
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 303096647X 9783030966478  | 
| ISSN: | 1865-0929 1865-0937  | 
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-030-96648-5_7 |