Circulating cell‐free BRAFV600E as a biomarker in children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis
Summary The BRAFV600E mutation is reported in half of patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). This study investigated the detection of the BRAFV600E allele in circulating cell‐free (ccf) DNA in a paediatric LCH cohort. Children with BRAFV600E‐mutated LCH were investigated to detect ccf BR...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of haematology Vol. 178; no. 3; pp. 457 - 467 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.08.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0007-1048 1365-2141 1365-2141 |
DOI | 10.1111/bjh.14695 |
Cover
Summary: | Summary
The BRAFV600E mutation is reported in half of patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). This study investigated the detection of the BRAFV600E allele in circulating cell‐free (ccf) DNA in a paediatric LCH cohort. Children with BRAFV600E‐mutated LCH were investigated to detect ccf BRAFV600E at diagnosis (n = 48) and during follow‐up (n = 17) using a picolitre‐droplet digital PCR assay. At diagnosis, ccf BRAFV600E was positive in 15/15 (100%) patients with risk‐organ positive multisystem (RO+ MS) LCH, 5/12 (42%) of patients with RO− MS LCH and 3/21 (14%) patients with single‐system (SS) LCH (P < 0·001, Fisher's exact test). The positive BRAFV600E load was higher for RO+ patients (mean, 2·90%; range, 0·04–11·4%) than for RO− patients (mean, 0·16%; range, 0·01–0·39) (P = 0·003, Mann–Whitney U test). After first‐line vinblastine‐steroid induction therapy, 7/7 (100%) of the non‐responders remained positive for ccf BRAFV600E compared to 2/4 (50%) of the partial‐responders and 0/4 of the complete responders (P = 0·002, Fisher's exact test). Six children treated with vemurafenib showed a clinical response that was associated with a decrease in the ccf BRAFV600E load at day 15. Thus, ccf BRAFV600E is a promising biomarker for monitoring the response to therapy for children with RO+ MS LCH or RO− LCH resistant to first‐line chemotherapy. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-1048 1365-2141 1365-2141 |
DOI: | 10.1111/bjh.14695 |