Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: A report from the American Dental Association

• Published in: The Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) Vol. 149; no. 10; p. 837
• Main Authors: Slayton, Rebecca L, Urquhart, Olivia, Araujo, Marcelo W B, Fontana, Margherita, Guzmán-Armstrong, Sandra, Nascimento, Marcelle M, Nový, Brian B, Tinanoff, Norman, Weyant, Robert J, Wolff, Mark S, Young, Douglas A, Zero, Domenick T, Tampi, Malavika P, Pilcher, Lauren, Banfield, Laura, Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.10.2018
• Subjects: Adult; American Dental Association; Child; Dental Caries; Evidence-Based Dentistry; Humans; Pit and Fissure Sealants; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tooth, Deciduous; United States; United States; evidence-based dentistry; practice guidelines; general practice; decision making; nonrestorative treatments; American Dental Association; Carious lesion; caries; clinical recommendations
• ISSN: 1943-4723; 1943-4723
• DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.002

An expert panel convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs and the Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated evidence-based clinical recommendations for the arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated dental caries using nonrestorative treatments in children and adults. The authors conducted a systematic search of the literature in MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane database of systematic reviews to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on nonrestorative treatments for noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty in the evidence and move from the evidence to the decisions. The expert panel formulated 11 clinical recommendations, each specific to lesion type, tooth surface, and dentition. Of the most effective interventions, the panel provided recommendations for the use of 38% silver diamine fluoride, sealants, 5% sodium fluoride varnish, 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel, and 5,000 parts per million fluoride (1.1% sodium fluoride) toothpaste or gel, among others. The panel also provided a recommendation against the use of 10% casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. Although the recommended interventions are often used for caries prevention, or in conjunction with restorative treatment options, these approaches have shown to be effective in arresting or reversing carious lesions. Clinicians are encouraged to prioritize use of these interventions based on effectiveness, safety, and feasibility.