New mechanical recanalization devices - the future in pediatric stroke treatment?

To evaluate the recanalization rate and clinical outcome in children with acute ischemic stroke following treatment with innovative mechanical thrombectomy devices. Three subjects aged 7-16 years presenting with acute cerebral vascular occlusions (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] 0) were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of invasive cardiology Vol. 22; no. 2; p. 63
Main Authors Grunwald, Iris Quasar, Walter, Silke, Shamdeen, Mohammed Ghiath, Dautermann, Anna, Roth, Christian, Haass, Anton, Bolar, Linet Jenifa, Reith, Wolfgang, Kühn, Anna Luisa, Papanagiotou, Panagiotis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.02.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1557-2501
1557-2501

Cover

More Information
Summary:To evaluate the recanalization rate and clinical outcome in children with acute ischemic stroke following treatment with innovative mechanical thrombectomy devices. Three subjects aged 7-16 years presenting with acute cerebral vascular occlusions (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] 0) were treated with either the Penumbra System, operating on an aspiration platform, or the Phenox clot retriever device, a flexible wire compound with perpendicularly-oriented polyamid microfilaments. Target vessels were the internal carotid artery, the middle cerebral artery and the basilar artery. Successful recanalization (TIMI 3) was attained in all cases. No device-related complications or intracranial hemorrhage occurred. Follow up was conducted for up to 30 days. A 10- to 26-point improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was achieved. Mechanical thrombectomy devices possess a dual advantage whereby they can achieve instant recanalization as well as minimize the number of bleeds that customarily accompany intravenous and intra-arterial therapy. These new devices could contribute greatly to treatment decisions in a field not yet clearly defined by current guidelines.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1557-2501
1557-2501