Determination of Vascular Age in Men Using the Coronary Calcium Score and its Impact on Restratification of Cardiovascular Risk

• Published in: Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia Vol. 120; no. 10; p. e20230253
• Main Authors: Polli, Ismael, Bruscato, Neide Maria, Luz, Protasio Lemos Da, Freitas, Douglas Dal Más, Almeida, Angélica Oliveira de, Carli, Waldemar De, Moriguchi, Emilio Hideyuki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Portuguese
• Published: 01.01.2023
• ISSN: 1678-4170; 1678-4170
• DOI: 10.36660/abc.20230253

Identifying asymptomatic individuals at risk of developing cardiovascular disease is one of the main goals of preventive cardiology. The coronary calcium score (CCS) makes it possible to estimate vascular age, which has shown to be more reliable than chronological age for determining cardiovascular risk.BACKGROUNDIdentifying asymptomatic individuals at risk of developing cardiovascular disease is one of the main goals of preventive cardiology. The coronary calcium score (CCS) makes it possible to estimate vascular age, which has shown to be more reliable than chronological age for determining cardiovascular risk.To reclassify cardiovascular risk based on arterial age and evaluate CCS progression during follow-up.OBJECTIVESTo reclassify cardiovascular risk based on arterial age and evaluate CCS progression during follow-up.We included 150 asymptomatic men who underwent clinical and CCS evaluation in 2 evaluations with an interval of 7.6 years. We classified patients by traditional risk scores and arterial age. We evaluated which variables were associated with greater CCS progression during the period, considering a statistical significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).METHODSWe included 150 asymptomatic men who underwent clinical and CCS evaluation in 2 evaluations with an interval of 7.6 years. We classified patients by traditional risk scores and arterial age. We evaluated which variables were associated with greater CCS progression during the period, considering a statistical significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).The use of arterial age in the stratification of cardiovascular risk in comparison with the Framingham risk score (FRS) reclassified 29% of individuals to a higher risk category and 37% to a lower risk category. Regarding the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology score (ASCVD), 31% were reclassified as higher risk and 36% as lower risk. The initial classification by arterial age was directly related to the progression of CCS throughout follow-up (p < 0.001). This was not observed for the FRS (p = 0.862) or ASCVD (p = 0.153). The individual variables most associated with CCS progression were high systolic blood pressure and low HDL.RESULTSThe use of arterial age in the stratification of cardiovascular risk in comparison with the Framingham risk score (FRS) reclassified 29% of individuals to a higher risk category and 37% to a lower risk category. Regarding the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology score (ASCVD), 31% were reclassified as higher risk and 36% as lower risk. The initial classification by arterial age was directly related to the progression of CCS throughout follow-up (p < 0.001). This was not observed for the FRS (p = 0.862) or ASCVD (p = 0.153). The individual variables most associated with CCS progression were high systolic blood pressure and low HDL.Cardiovascular risk stratification using arterial age showed a better association than the FRS and ASCVD in identifying individuals with higher risk of atherosclerosis progression.CONCLUSIONCardiovascular risk stratification using arterial age showed a better association than the FRS and ASCVD in identifying individuals with higher risk of atherosclerosis progression.