Optimization of electrochemical machining process parameters using teaching-learning-based algorithm

Electrochemical machining (ECM) process has a wide capability to generate complex shapes on different materials which are occasionally difficult to cut. Its ability to machine a variety of materials makes it an extensively accepted non-traditional machining process in modern day manufacturing sector...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIP conference proceedings Vol. 2273; no. 1
Main Authors Diyaley, Sunny, Chakraborty, Shankar
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Melville American Institute of Physics 02.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI10.1063/5.0024474

Cover

More Information
Summary:Electrochemical machining (ECM) process has a wide capability to generate complex shapes on different materials which are occasionally difficult to cut. Its ability to machine a variety of materials makes it an extensively accepted non-traditional machining process in modern day manufacturing sector. Thus, selection of the optimal input parameters for an ECM process is crucial for its efficient utilization. In this paper, a comparative analysis is made among four metaheuristics, i.e. firefly algorithm (FA), differential evolution (DE), ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm and teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm to discover the optimal values of various control parameters for an ECM process. Dimensional inaccuracy, tool life and material removal rate are the three responses considered which are subjected to temperature, choking and passivity constraints. The TLBO algorithm shows the best performance among the others without violating any of the constraints. The paired t-test is also performed to prove the efficacy of TLBO algorithm over the other optimization techniques. The results derived from these algorithms are finally compared with those obtained by the past researchers using other optimization methods for both single and multi-objective optimization problems.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1
content type line 21
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0024474