SELLING THE INCHOATE MODE
Do results matter in criminal law? Many say "No" and recommend redrafting crimes in "the inchoate mode". Others answer "Yes" and defend the division between complete and attempted offences. This paper considers a third (non-general) answer: "Sometimes". Could...
Saved in:
Published in | Singapore journal of legal studies pp. 92 - 107 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Singapore
Singapore Journal of Legal Studies
01.03.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0218-2173 |
Cover
Summary: | Do results matter in criminal law? Many say "No" and recommend redrafting crimes in "the inchoate mode". Others answer "Yes" and defend the division between complete and attempted offences. This paper considers a third (non-general) answer: "Sometimes". Could it be that in some contexts results matter significantly more than in others? Murder and fraud are contrasted; while the former appears to be a "hard sell" for the inchoate mode, the latter has, at least in one major jurisdiction, passed into law and bedded down with apparent ease. Perhaps results matter in murder in a way they do not in fraud. Two contrasts are drawn, first that murder is a "horrific crime", while fraud is not, and secondly, that the core of the wrong of kinds of fraud might be contained in the attempt. Maybe the mistake is to seek for a general answer to the question of whether results matter. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0218-2173 |