Prognostic factors following surgical resection of distal bile duct cancer

Purpose: Prognostic factors for distal bile duct cancer are contentious. This study was conducted to analyze the prognostic factors of distal bile duct cancer after surgery with the aim of identifying those associated with diminished survival. Methods: Two hundred forty-one patients who underwent py...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of surgical treatment and research Vol. 85; no. 5; pp. 212 - 218
Main Authors Young Jae Chung, Dong Wook Choi, Seong Ho Choi, Jin Seok Heo, Dong Hun Kim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 대한외과학회 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2288-6575
2288-6796

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose: Prognostic factors for distal bile duct cancer are contentious. This study was conducted to analyze the prognostic factors of distal bile duct cancer after surgery with the aim of identifying those associated with diminished survival. Methods: Two hundred forty-one patients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) or Whipple procedure in our tertiary hospital from February 1995 to June 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were pathologically proven to have distal bile duct adenocarcinoma. Postoperative complications, survival, and well-known prognostic factors after resection for distal bile duct cancer were investigated. Results: Preoperative elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level (P =0.006), positive resection margin (P < 0.001), advanced T stage (P = 0.043), and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.002) were significantly independent worse prognostic indicators by multivariate analysis of resectable distal bile duct cancer. Conclusion: R0 resection is the most important so that frozen sections should be utilized aggressively during each operation. For the distal bile duct cancer with elevated preoperative CA 19-9 level or advanced stage, further study on postoperative adjuvant treatment may be warranted KCI Citation Count: 20
Bibliography:G704-000991.2013.85.5.003
ISSN:2288-6575
2288-6796