한의 오장 변증·평가 설문지 개발을 위한 신뢰도 및 타당도 평가

The aim of this study was to identify the reliability and the validity of Five Organs Questionnaire (FOQ). In this study, 335 data was collected from early adulthood of A-city, D-city and C-city in South Korea from Dec. 2016 to Jan. 2017, and the collected data was analyzed with SPSS 23.0 software....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in동의생리병리학회지 Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 173 - 181
Main Authors 장은수(Eunsu Jang), 김윤영(Yunyoung Kim), 박양춘(Yang Chun Park), 전주현(Ju Hyun Jeon), 정인철(In-Chul Jung)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한의병리학회 2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-7698
2288-2529
2283-2529
DOI10.15188/kjopp.2017.06.31.3.173

Cover

More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to identify the reliability and the validity of Five Organs Questionnaire (FOQ). In this study, 335 data was collected from early adulthood of A-city, D-city and C-city in South Korea from Dec. 2016 to Jan. 2017, and the collected data was analyzed with SPSS 23.0 software. The result showed that the Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ of five organs was 0.775-0.853. The reliabilities of test and retest Intra Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for the five organs were .891-.929 in pattern identification and .874-.930 in functional evaluation, respectively. Each organ was divided by two factors, and the factor loadings of Liver, Heart, Spleen, Lung and Kidney were 52.973%, 54.534%, 57.060%, 53.803%, and 46.337%, respectively. The functional evaluation of five organs was associated with self-rated health status as r was -.443 to -.583(p<.001), and quality of life as r was -.5.17 to -.716(p<.001), respectively. The test-retest diagnostic agreement was 67.2% and Kappa was 0.562. This study revealed that FOQ is a reliable and valid questionnaire.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201719951668799
https://kmpath.jams.or.kr
ISSN:1738-7698
2288-2529
2283-2529
DOI:10.15188/kjopp.2017.06.31.3.173