사상체질 진단검사를 위한 데이터마이닝 알고리즘 연구
This study was to compare the effectiveness and validity of various data-mining algorithm for Sasang type diagnostic test. We compared the sensitivity and specificity index of nine attribute selection and eleven class classification algorithms with 31 data-set characterizing Sasang typology and 10-f...
Saved in:
Published in | 동의생리병리학회지 Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 1234 - 1240 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Korean |
Published |
한의병리학회
2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1738-7698 2288-2529 2283-2529 |
Cover
Summary: | This study was to compare the effectiveness and validity of various data-mining algorithm for Sasang type diagnostic test. We compared the sensitivity and specificity index of nine attribute selection and eleven class classification algorithms with 31 data-set characterizing Sasang typology and 10-fold validation methods installed in Waikato Environment Knowledge Analysis (WEKA). The highest classification validity score can be acquired as follows; 69.9 as Percentage Correctly Predicted index with Naive Bayes Classifier, 80 as sensitivity index with LWL/Tae-Eum type, 93.5 as specificity index with Naive Bayes Classifier/So-Eum type. The classification algorithm with highest PCP index of 69.62 after attribute selection was Naive Bayes Classifier. In this study we can find that the best-fit algorithm for traditional medicine is case sensitive and that characteristics of clinical circumstances, and data-mining algorithms and study purpose should be considered to get the highest validity even with the well defined data sets. It is also confirmed that we can't find one-fits-all algorithm and there should be many studies with trials and errors. This study will serve as a pivotal foundation for the development of medical instruments for Pattern Identification and Sasang type diagnosis on the basis of traditional Korean Medicine. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200916955021090 G704-000534.2009.23.6.016 |
ISSN: | 1738-7698 2288-2529 2283-2529 |