복식 전자궁 적출술 후 정맥 내 자가통증조절장치에 혼합된 Midazolam의 항구토효과

Background: Midazolam has been reported to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We studied the antiemetic effect of midazolam in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine after total abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: Group C (n = 27) received bolus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean journal of anesthesiology Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 591 - 597
Main Authors 정석호, Seok Ho Jung, 전영훈, Young Hun Jeon
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한마취통증의학회 30.11.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2005-6419
2005-7563

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Midazolam has been reported to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We studied the antiemetic effect of midazolam in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine after total abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: Group C (n = 27) received bolus of morphine 5 mg and PCA of morphine 1 mg/ml. Group M1 (n = 27) received bolus of morphine 5 mg and midazolam 1 mg and PCA of midazolam 0.2 mg/ml mixed with morphine 1 mg/ml. Group M2 (n = 27) received bolus of morphine 5 mg and midazolam 1 mg and PCA of midazolam 0.4 mg/ml mixed with morphine 1 mg/ml. The PCA delivery system was programmed to deliver 1 ml of the test solution per demand with a 10 min lockout interval and no background infusion. The incidence of PONV, metoclopramide and ketorolac usage, morphine and midazolam consumption, pain, sedation, and other side effects were assessed at 1, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h after the operation. Results: The incidences of PONV were 19 (70%) in Group C, 14 (52%) in Group M1 and 10 (37%) in Group M2. The incidence of PONV in Group M2 was significantly lower than that in Group C (P < 0.05). Patients in Group M2 experienced more sedation than those in Group C (P < 0.05). No severe sedation was observed in all groups. Conclusions: Combination of midazolam 0.4 mg per morphine 1 mg in PCA had more effective antiemetic efficacy than control without significant adverse effects. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2006; 51: 591~7)
Bibliography:The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
G704-000679.2006.51.5.017
ISSN:2005-6419
2005-7563