양측 종골 골절 환자의 치료 후 임상적 및 방사선학적 결과

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to find out clinical and radiological outcomes in 70 patients of both calcaneal fracture. Materials and Methods: From March 1993 to March 2011, 70 patients underwent non-operative management or operative management at our hospital. Conservative management was pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in대한족부족관절학회지 Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 229 - 234
Main Authors 이정길, 김갑래, 현윤석, 구본재, 이효범, 이재희, Lee, Jeong-Gil, Kim, Gab-Lae, Hyun, Yoon-Suk, Koo, Bon-Jae, Lee, Hyo-Beom, Lee, Jae-Hee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Korean
Published 대한족부족관절학회 01.12.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-3757
2288-8551

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose: The purpose of this study is to find out clinical and radiological outcomes in 70 patients of both calcaneal fracture. Materials and Methods: From March 1993 to March 2011, 70 patients underwent non-operative management or operative management at our hospital. Conservative management was performed in 15 cases of undisplaced fracture (Group A). Operative management was performed in 125 cases including 32 cases of undisplaced fracture (Group B), 60 cases of joint depression type fracture (Group C), 33 cases of tongue type fracture (Group D). Results were evaluated by VAS score, AOFAS score, circle draw test, Bohler angle (BA), Gissane angle, width & height of calcaneus. Results: VAS scores were 2.0 in group A, 2.0 in group B, 2.2 in group C, 2.7 in group D. AOFAS scores were 90.4 in group A, 91.9 in group B, 72.2 in group C, 79.2 in group D. Circle draw tests were 8.4 cm in group A, 10.1 cm in group B, 7.6 cm in group C, 7.9 cm in group D. Bohler angles (BA) and Gissane angles were $19.1^{\circ}$, $96.7^{\circ}$ in group A, $21.8^{\circ}$, $119.1^{\circ}$ in group B, $26.3^{\circ}$, $121.2^{\circ}$ in group C, $19.7^{\circ}$, $119.7^{\circ}$ in group D. Calcaneal widths and heights were 39.5 mm, 31.6 mm in group A, 32.7 mm, 37.0 mm in group B, 34.4 mm, 39.2 mm in group C, 35.2 mm, 38.7 mm in group D. Conclusion: The main cause of bilateral calcaneal fracture is an injury from a fall, and the cases were more frequently occurred in men than women. Also the fracture in the right side tend to occur more severely compared to the left side. The surgical treatment shows better results than conservative treatment in bilateral calcaneal fracture.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201208138128774
G704-SER000010535.2012.16.4.012
ISSN:1738-3757
2288-8551