옆으로 누워 엉덩관절 벌림운동 시 복부드로우-인, 복부브레이싱, 골반압박벨트가 중간볼기근과 몸통 근육의 활성도에 미치는 영향

Background: Improvement of lumbo-pelvic stability can reduce the compensatory action of the quadratus lumborum (QL) and selectively strengthen the gluteus medius (GM) during side-lying hip abduction (SHA). There are abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) and abdominal bracing (AB) as active ways, and pel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHan'guk Chŏnmun Mulli Ch'iryo Hakhoe chi = Journal of the Korean Academy of University Trained Physical Therapists Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 22 - 30
Main Authors 김동우, Dong-woo Kim, 김태호, Tae-ho Kim
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한국전문물리치료학회 28.02.2018
Korean Academy Of University Trained Physical Therapy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1225-8962
2287-982X
DOI10.12674/ptk.2018.25.1.022

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Improvement of lumbo-pelvic stability can reduce the compensatory action of the quadratus lumborum (QL) and selectively strengthen the gluteus medius (GM) during side-lying hip abduction (SHA). There are abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) and abdominal bracing (AB) as active ways, and pelvic compression belt (PCB) as a passive way to increase of lumbo-pelvic stability. It is necessary to compare how these stabilization methods affect the selective strengthening of the GM. Objects: To investigate the effects of ADIM, AB, and PCB during SHA on the electromyography (EMG) activity of the GM, QL, external oblique (EO) and internal oblique (IO), and the GM/QL EMG activity ratio. Methods: A total of 20 healthy male adults participated in the study. The subjects performed three conditions in side-lying in random order: SHA with ADIM (SHA-ADIM), SHA with AB (SHA-AB), and SHA with PCB (SHA-PCB). To compare the differences among the three conditions, the EMG activities of the GM, QL, EO and IO, and GM/QL EMG activity ratio were analyzed using one-way repeated ANOVA. Results: The EMG activity of the QL was significantly higher in SHA-AB than in SHA-ADIM and SHA-PCB. The GM/QL activity ratio was significantly higher in SHA-PCB than in SHA-ADIM and SHA-AB. In addition, the figure for SHA-ADIM was significantly higher than that for SHA-AB. In the case of the EO, the figure for SHA-AB was significantly higher than corresponding values for the other two conditions. The figure for SHA-ADIM was significantly higher than that for SHA-PCB. The EMG activity of the IO was significantly higher in SHA-AH than in SHA-PCB. Conclusion: It can be suggested that wearing the PCB can more selectively strengthen the GM than to perform ADIM and AB during SHA. In addition, the ADIM can be recommended when there is a need to strengthen abdominal muscles during SHA.
Bibliography:KOREAN ACADEMY OF UNIVERSITH TRAINED PHYSICAL THERAPISTS
KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201809538047403
https://www.ptkorea.org/journal/view.html?uid=846&vmd=Full
ISSN:1225-8962
2287-982X
DOI:10.12674/ptk.2018.25.1.022