Velopharyngeal Function in Patients with Submucous Cleft Palate

In 50 patients with submucous cleft palate who had visited our department during the period from 1985 to 2003, the velopharyngeal function was examined according to their treatment courses. 1. The subjects enrolled in this study were composed of 24 males (48.0%) and 26 females (52.0%). 2. The subjec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Japanese Cleft Palate Association Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 25 - 33
Main Authors MAKISHI, Syouko, MAEKAWA, Takako, ARAKAKI, Keiichi, NAKAMA, Joji, TENGAN, Toshimoto, ISHIKAWA, Taku, SUNAKAWA, Hajime, SUNAKAWA, Masayo
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Cleft Palate Association 30.04.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0386-5185
2186-5701
DOI10.11224/cleftpalate1976.33.1_25

Cover

More Information
Summary:In 50 patients with submucous cleft palate who had visited our department during the period from 1985 to 2003, the velopharyngeal function was examined according to their treatment courses. 1. The subjects enrolled in this study were composed of 24 males (48.0%) and 26 females (52.0%). 2. The subjects age ranged from 1 month postpartum to 29 years with the average of 5.08 years old. 3. Their main complain was verbal problems in 30 cases (60.0%), request of detailed oral examination in 15 cases (30.0%), request of surgical intervention in 3 cases (6.0%), and request of orthodontic/prosthetic treatment in 2 cases (4.0%). 4. According to the treatment course, there were 27 cases in the operated group (65.1%),14 cases in the non-operated group (34.1%) and the remaining 9 cases in other group (1.8%). 5. The velopharyngeal function evaluated after operation (averaged 18 months postoperatively) was good (good + fairly good) in 70.4% of patients in the operated group and 84.1% of patients with no mental retardation. In the 8 cases with mental retardation, the velopharyngeal function was evaluated as good (good + fairly good) in 37.5%. 6. The velopharyngeal function evaluated after observation period or verbal treatment in the nonoperated group was good (good + fairly good) in 92.8%.
ISSN:0386-5185
2186-5701
DOI:10.11224/cleftpalate1976.33.1_25