Enantiomer analysis of linalool in commercial bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso) essential oils

The purity of commercial bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso) essential oils was assessed by analyzing the enantiomers of linalool and linalyl acetate. The study included 34 cold-pressed oils and one steam-distilled oil obtained from peels. Additionally, laboratory-prepared samples comprised a cold-pres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapan Journal of Aromatherapy Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 42 - 49
Main Authors SAWAMURA, Masayoshi, NAGANO, Momota, ASANO, Kimito, ASHIZAWA, Honami, KITAOKA, Yuichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Aroma Environment Association of Japan 07.02.2025
公益社団法人 日本アロマ環境協会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1346-3748
2189-5147
DOI10.15035/aeaj.260105

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purity of commercial bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso) essential oils was assessed by analyzing the enantiomers of linalool and linalyl acetate. The study included 34 cold-pressed oils and one steam-distilled oil obtained from peels. Additionally, laboratory-prepared samples comprised a cold-pressed oil and a hexane-extracted oil from bergamot fruit. The analysis also included three aged cold-pressed oils and a racemic reagent of linalool. The enantiomeric analysis was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with a chiral column in the selected-ion monitoring mode. The mass units were set at m/z 71.0, 93.0, 80.0 and 121.0 for linalool and linalyl acetate. Results demonstrated that the enantiomer excess % of (R)-(−)-linalool over (S)-(+)-linalool exceeded 98.0% in most commercial cold-pressed and steam-distilled bergamot oils, as well as in the lab-prepared and aged samples. These findings indicate that the enantiomeric composition was unaffected by the experimental conditions. In conclusion, based on the enantiomeric excess of (R)-(−)-linalool, the high enantiomeric purity of 29 of commercial bergamot essential oils was confirmed, while the remaining 9 oils did not meet the verification criteria.
ISSN:1346-3748
2189-5147
DOI:10.15035/aeaj.260105