Examination of Long-turn prognostic predictor after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG)

Aim: The primary aim of this study was to consider the suitable patients and time for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) based on outcome predictors. Subjects and Methods: The subjects were 183 patients who had undergone PEG at our hospital between January 2004 and December 2010. PEG was perf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJomyaku Keicho Eiyo Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 981 - 986
Main Authors SUGANAMI, Yuki, AIZAWA, Satoshi, NISHIMURA, Michiaki, SATO, Noriko, YAMAGUCHI, Muneyuki, KANZAKI, Norio, YAMADA, Yumiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2013
日本静脈経腸栄養学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1344-4980
1881-3623
DOI10.11244/jjspen.28.981

Cover

More Information
Summary:Aim: The primary aim of this study was to consider the suitable patients and time for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) based on outcome predictors. Subjects and Methods: The subjects were 183 patients who had undergone PEG at our hospital between January 2004 and December 2010. PEG was performed by Ponsky’s Pull method. Results: The most frequent causes of death were pneumonia and respiratory disorder. Four factors (male sex, malignant tumor, serum cholinesterase activity, and ability to take food orally after PEG) were significant outcome predictors on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Patients who were able to take even a little food orally after PEG were the best candidates for PEG, because patients who were unable to take food orally had a risk of subclinical aspiration and pneumonia. PEG should be performed early, before the patient’s nutritional condition deteriorates as indicated by serum cholinesterase activity.
ISSN:1344-4980
1881-3623
DOI:10.11244/jjspen.28.981