Comparison Between Media Literacy and Information Literacy in Textbooks of Public in High School and Civics in Junior High School

We compare the usage of “media literacy” and “information literacy” from descriptions in the textbooks of “public”, a compulsory subject in high school, and of “civics” in social studies of junior high school. As a result, the difference between the literacy is in “public” more ambiguous than in “ci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapan Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 47; no. 3; pp. 515 - 525
Main Author FUJISAKI, Seiya
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japan Society for Educational Technology 20.12.2023
一般社団法人 日本教育工学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1349-8290
2189-6453
DOI10.15077/jjet.47034

Cover

More Information
Summary:We compare the usage of “media literacy” and “information literacy” from descriptions in the textbooks of “public”, a compulsory subject in high school, and of “civics” in social studies of junior high school. As a result, the difference between the literacy is in “public” more ambiguous than in “civics”. In addition, while “criticism” and “judgment” are important in media literacy, description in textbooks of “public” requires that high school students should act more concretely and proactively than in junior high school. Textbooks of “civics” include more references to mass media than of “public”, suggesting that high school students need to pay more attention to the Internet, such as SNS. In addition, it is necessary to keep in mind the unique context of social studies, which seeks the awareness of the ”citizens” who shape “public opinion”.
ISSN:1349-8290
2189-6453
DOI:10.15077/jjet.47034