BASIC AND CLINICAL STUDIES ON RU 28965

We examined RU 28965, a new macrolide for oral use, for its antibacterial activity in vitro and clinical efficac, and obtained the following results. 1. Antibacterial activity: MICs of RU 28965 for clinically isolated organisms were determined and compared with those of EM, MOM, JM, ABPC, and CCL. R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCHEMOTHERAPY Vol. 36; no. Supplement4; pp. 266 - 276
Main Authors TOHGOH, TOSHITO, AMAGAI, RIEKO, HONMA, SATOKI, TOYODA, TAKEO, OKUI, SHINJI, FUJITA, TAKANORI, KAWAI, MIEKO, TAKASHI, KOHTARO, KURISHIMA, SETSUKO, YUHARA, TAKAMICHI, FUKUI, TOSHIO, KATSU, MASATAKA, MIZUKOSHI, KAZUO
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Japanese Society of Chemotherapy 1988
公益社団法人 日本化学療法学会
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0009-3165
1884-5894
DOI10.11250/chemotherapy1953.36.Supplement4_266

Cover

More Information
Summary:We examined RU 28965, a new macrolide for oral use, for its antibacterial activity in vitro and clinical efficac, and obtained the following results. 1. Antibacterial activity: MICs of RU 28965 for clinically isolated organisms were determined and compared with those of EM, MOM, JM, ABPC, and CCL. RU 28965 was most active against S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae and S. pneumuoniae, as were EM and ABPC. RU 28965 was a little less active against S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus and H. influenzae than EM, but was more active against these than JM and MOM. Against S. aureus and C. jejuni, RU 28965 was a little less active than EM, JM and MOM. 2. Clinical efficacy A daily dose of 300 mg of RU 28965 was given orally for 3-14 days to 13 patients with respiratory tract infection. Clinical response was excellent in 1, good in 7, poor in 3 and unknown in 3 patients. As side-effects, eruption and diarrhea were observed in 1 patient. No abnormal laboratory findings related to RU 28965 were seen.
ISSN:0009-3165
1884-5894
DOI:10.11250/chemotherapy1953.36.Supplement4_266