IV.ロボット支援下直腸手術の現状と未来
ロボット支援下手術は,多関節を有する手術器具,手ぶれ防止機構やmotion scalingによる精緻な動作によって,従来の腹腔鏡手術での操作困難性などの短所を補うことができ,特に直腸癌手術のような,狭い骨盤腔内で精密な手術操作を行うことに適している.本邦では2009年にintuitive社のda Vinci Surgical Systemが薬事承認,2018年4月からはロボット支援下腹腔鏡下直腸切除・切断術が保険収載され,ロボット支援下直腸手術の件数は増加している.現在のところ開腹手術,腹腔鏡手術に対する優越性に関する強いエビデンスはないが,技術的難易度が高い症例での有用性が示唆されている.現...
Saved in:
Published in | 日本大腸肛門病学会雑誌 Vol. 72; no. 10; pp. 567 - 574 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Japanese |
Published |
日本大腸肛門病学会
2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0047-1801 1882-9619 |
DOI | 10.3862/jcoloproctology.72.567 |
Cover
Abstract | ロボット支援下手術は,多関節を有する手術器具,手ぶれ防止機構やmotion scalingによる精緻な動作によって,従来の腹腔鏡手術での操作困難性などの短所を補うことができ,特に直腸癌手術のような,狭い骨盤腔内で精密な手術操作を行うことに適している.本邦では2009年にintuitive社のda Vinci Surgical Systemが薬事承認,2018年4月からはロボット支援下腹腔鏡下直腸切除・切断術が保険収載され,ロボット支援下直腸手術の件数は増加している.現在のところ開腹手術,腹腔鏡手術に対する優越性に関する強いエビデンスはないが,技術的難易度が高い症例での有用性が示唆されている.現在いくつかの企業で,新技術を搭載した新型手術支援ロボットが開発されており,今後手術システムの改良による治療成績の向上や,企業間の競合によるロボットや周辺機器の低価格化が期待される. |
---|---|
AbstractList | ロボット支援下手術は,多関節を有する手術器具,手ぶれ防止機構やmotion scalingによる精緻な動作によって,従来の腹腔鏡手術での操作困難性などの短所を補うことができ,特に直腸癌手術のような,狭い骨盤腔内で精密な手術操作を行うことに適している.本邦では2009年にintuitive社のda Vinci Surgical Systemが薬事承認,2018年4月からはロボット支援下腹腔鏡下直腸切除・切断術が保険収載され,ロボット支援下直腸手術の件数は増加している.現在のところ開腹手術,腹腔鏡手術に対する優越性に関する強いエビデンスはないが,技術的難易度が高い症例での有用性が示唆されている.現在いくつかの企業で,新技術を搭載した新型手術支援ロボットが開発されており,今後手術システムの改良による治療成績の向上や,企業間の競合によるロボットや周辺機器の低価格化が期待される. |
Author | 徳永, 正則 松山, 貴俊 中島, 康晃 絹笠, 祐介 |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 松山, 貴俊 organization: 東京医科歯科大学大学院消化管外科学分野 – sequence: 1 fullname: 中島, 康晃 organization: 東京医科歯科大学大学院消化管外科学分野 – sequence: 1 fullname: 絹笠, 祐介 organization: 東京医科歯科大学大学院消化管外科学分野 – sequence: 1 fullname: 徳永, 正則 organization: 東京医科歯科大学大学院消化管外科学分野 |
BookMark | eNpdkD9Lw0Achg-pYK39Cn6D1LvfXe8uoxT_VAou6houl0tNqE1JsnQsQVALdtDNOjgIIqhLkQ7il4mk3fwKVhQH4eV9lpd3eFZRqRt1DULrBNeo5LAR6qgT9eJIpwu2-zUBtToXS6hMpATL5sQuoTLGTFhEYrKCqkkSuLgumU2FxGUkm0efb5d59pRn4zzL8uysuH4pRpOP6XB2M5mfTovz4fzuKh88z0bvs4vXfPBQjB-L2_s1tOyrTmKqv6ygw-2tg8au1drfaTY2W1YIlGHLc40nQC8CTPmepiCwpw3F0icctG973AYG2K37RlLGgBmpuBHAmSuZErSC9n5-wyRVbeP04uBExX1HxWmgO8b5J8AR4BD83QsNfyN9rGInVPQLQAVwtw |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 日本大腸肛門病学会 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 日本大腸肛門病学会 |
DOI | 10.3862/jcoloproctology.72.567 |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1882-9619 |
EndPage | 574 |
ExternalDocumentID | article_jcoloproctology_72_10_72_567_article_char_ja |
GroupedDBID | 123 2WC ABDBF ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CS3 F5P JSF KQ8 OK1 RJT |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j2340-dbed72c72c24afdc3270dce308f162cf9d692420b5fe834424e8a6e7264b84a73 |
ISSN | 0047-1801 |
IngestDate | Wed Sep 03 06:29:17 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Language | Japanese |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j2340-dbed72c72c24afdc3270dce308f162cf9d692420b5fe834424e8a6e7264b84a73 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcoloproctology/72/10/72_567/_article/-char/ja |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | jstage_primary_article_jcoloproctology_72_10_72_567_article_char_ja |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2019 text: 2019 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | 日本大腸肛門病学会雑誌 |
PublicationTitleAlternate | 日本大腸肛門病会誌 |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | 日本大腸肛門病学会 |
Publisher_xml | – name: 日本大腸肛門病学会 |
References | 9) Cui Y, Li C, Xu Z, et al: Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 13:1247-1257, 2017 25) D'Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, et al: Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1887-1895, 2013 39) Spinelli A, David G, Gidaro S, et al: First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback. Colorectal Dis 20:228-235, 2017 6) Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al: Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 318:1569-1580, 2017 21) Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, et al: Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257:672-678, 2013 16) Baukloh JK, Reeh M, Spinoglio G, et al: Evaluation of the robotic approach concerning pitfalls in rectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1304-1311, 2017 29) Odermatt M, Ahmed J, Panteleimonitis S, et al: Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis. Surg Endosc 31:4067-4076, 2017 36) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al: Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32:4498-4505, 2018 7) Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, et al: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 267:1034-1046, 2017 17) Panteleimonitis S, Pickering O, Abbas H, et al: Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1079-1086, 2018 19) Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, et al: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1701-1710, 2016 41) Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, et al: Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32:1636-1655, 2018 3) Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al: Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 314:1356-1363, 2015 32) Morgan MS, Shakir NA, Garcia-Gil M, et al: Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution. World J Urol 33:781-786, 2015 33) Hottenrott C: Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 25:3954-3956; author reply 3957-3958, 2011 35) Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al: Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 32:2466-2473, 2018 40) Lang S, Mattheis S, Hasskamp P, et al: A european multicenter study evaluating the flex robotic system in transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 127:391-395, 2017 4) Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al: Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689-1694; discussion 1695-1696, 2002 8) Li X, Wang T, Yao L, et al: The safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic TME in patients with rectal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7585, 2017 24) Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al: The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis 20:O103-O113, 2018 34) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:721-728, 2016 38) Shin US, Nancy You Y, Nguyen AT, et al: Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Robotic Resection for Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:2249-2257, 2016 15) Gorgun E, Ozben V, Costedio M, et al: Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients. Colorectal Dis 18:1063-1071, 2016 11) Xiong B, Ma L, Huang W, et al: Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. J Gastrointest Surg 19:516-526, 2015 5) Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, et al: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521-1525, 2006 2) Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al: Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 314:1346-1355, 2015 13) Fung A, Trabulsi N, Morris M, et al: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in the obese: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 31:2072-2088, 2017 23) Broholm M, Pommergaard HC, Gogenur I: Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 17:375-381, 2015 12) Liao G, Li YB, Zhao Z, et al: Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence. Sci Rep 6:26981, 2016 14) Hellan M, Ouellette J, Lagares-Garcia JA, et al: Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2151-2158, 2015 20) Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, et al: Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266-273, 2017 42) Hagn U, Konietschke R, Tobergte A, et al: DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:183-193, 2010 22) Lee SH, Lim S, Kim JH, et al: Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 89:190-201, 2015 27) Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS, et al: Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison. Surg Endosc 28:2821-2831, 2014 18) Bayraktar O, Aytac E, Ozben V, et al: Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:e8-e11, 2018 30) Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al: Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:275-281, 2009 26) Wang G, Wang Z, Jiang Z, et al: Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Med Robot 13:e1725, 2017 31) Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, et al: Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:403-408, 2009 43) SPORTTM SurgicalSystem: Titan Medical Inc. http://www.titanmedicalinc.com/product/. Accessed 22 May 2019 10) Sun Y, Xu H, Li Z, et al: Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 14:61, 2016 1) Intuitive Surgical Investor Presentation. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-irhome accessed on May 5, 2018 28) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al: Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679-1685, 2015 37) Hino H, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, et al: Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Tech Coloproctol 21:879-886, 2017 |
References_xml | – reference: 40) Lang S, Mattheis S, Hasskamp P, et al: A european multicenter study evaluating the flex robotic system in transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 127:391-395, 2017 – reference: 14) Hellan M, Ouellette J, Lagares-Garcia JA, et al: Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:2151-2158, 2015 – reference: 29) Odermatt M, Ahmed J, Panteleimonitis S, et al: Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis. Surg Endosc 31:4067-4076, 2017 – reference: 43) SPORTTM SurgicalSystem: Titan Medical Inc. http://www.titanmedicalinc.com/product/. Accessed 22 May 2019 – reference: 5) Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, et al: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521-1525, 2006 – reference: 28) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al: Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679-1685, 2015 – reference: 38) Shin US, Nancy You Y, Nguyen AT, et al: Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Robotic Resection for Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:2249-2257, 2016 – reference: 17) Panteleimonitis S, Pickering O, Abbas H, et al: Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1079-1086, 2018 – reference: 16) Baukloh JK, Reeh M, Spinoglio G, et al: Evaluation of the robotic approach concerning pitfalls in rectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1304-1311, 2017 – reference: 33) Hottenrott C: Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 25:3954-3956; author reply 3957-3958, 2011 – reference: 12) Liao G, Li YB, Zhao Z, et al: Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence. Sci Rep 6:26981, 2016 – reference: 4) Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al: Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689-1694; discussion 1695-1696, 2002 – reference: 26) Wang G, Wang Z, Jiang Z, et al: Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Med Robot 13:e1725, 2017 – reference: 24) Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al: The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis 20:O103-O113, 2018 – reference: 7) Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, et al: Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 267:1034-1046, 2017 – reference: 21) Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, et al: Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257:672-678, 2013 – reference: 23) Broholm M, Pommergaard HC, Gogenur I: Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 17:375-381, 2015 – reference: 15) Gorgun E, Ozben V, Costedio M, et al: Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients. Colorectal Dis 18:1063-1071, 2016 – reference: 36) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al: Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 32:4498-4505, 2018 – reference: 25) D'Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, et al: Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1887-1895, 2013 – reference: 22) Lee SH, Lim S, Kim JH, et al: Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 89:190-201, 2015 – reference: 35) Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al: Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 32:2466-2473, 2018 – reference: 2) Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al: Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 314:1346-1355, 2015 – reference: 20) Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, et al: Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching. Dis Colon Rectum 60:266-273, 2017 – reference: 37) Hino H, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, et al: Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Tech Coloproctol 21:879-886, 2017 – reference: 11) Xiong B, Ma L, Huang W, et al: Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies. J Gastrointest Surg 19:516-526, 2015 – reference: 6) Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al: Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 318:1569-1580, 2017 – reference: 19) Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, et al: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1701-1710, 2016 – reference: 8) Li X, Wang T, Yao L, et al: The safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic TME in patients with rectal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7585, 2017 – reference: 18) Bayraktar O, Aytac E, Ozben V, et al: Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:e8-e11, 2018 – reference: 13) Fung A, Trabulsi N, Morris M, et al: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in the obese: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 31:2072-2088, 2017 – reference: 42) Hagn U, Konietschke R, Tobergte A, et al: DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:183-193, 2010 – reference: 31) Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, et al: Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:403-408, 2009 – reference: 39) Spinelli A, David G, Gidaro S, et al: First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback. Colorectal Dis 20:228-235, 2017 – reference: 41) Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, et al: Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32:1636-1655, 2018 – reference: 27) Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS, et al: Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison. Surg Endosc 28:2821-2831, 2014 – reference: 10) Sun Y, Xu H, Li Z, et al: Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 14:61, 2016 – reference: 3) Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al: Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 314:1356-1363, 2015 – reference: 34) Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, et al: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:721-728, 2016 – reference: 1) Intuitive Surgical Investor Presentation. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-irhome accessed on May 5, 2018 – reference: 30) Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al: Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:275-281, 2009 – reference: 32) Morgan MS, Shakir NA, Garcia-Gil M, et al: Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution. World J Urol 33:781-786, 2015 – reference: 9) Cui Y, Li C, Xu Z, et al: Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 13:1247-1257, 2017 |
SSID | ssib058493780 ssib002670961 ssib005879710 ssib002671002 ssib002227193 ssib002003916 ssib002484655 ssj0064967 |
Score | 2.171314 |
Snippet | ロボット支援下手術は,多関節を有する手術器具,手ぶれ防止機構やmotion scalingによる精緻な動作によって,従来の腹腔鏡手術での操作困難性などの短所を... |
SourceID | jstage |
SourceType | Publisher |
StartPage | 567 |
SubjectTerms | da Vinci Surgical System ロボット支援下手術 低侵襲手術 手術支援ロボット 直腸癌 |
Title | IV.ロボット支援下直腸手術の現状と未来 |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcoloproctology/72/10/72_567/_article/-char/ja |
Volume | 72 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | 日本大腸肛門病学会雑誌, 2019, Vol.72(10), pp.567-574 |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1882-9619 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064967 issn: 0047-1801 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19670101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrR09axVB8IixsRFFxW9SOOXFu729_SjvXu6RCApCEtId91m8IookhXbhIagBU2hnLCwEEdQmSArxtwhP3kvnX3Bm9957l5BCQ-BY5u3Ozs7M3r2ZWXZnHecOL2pfh6V2eaawKOvCVaKqXK7RvuXkAJS0oH__gVhc4ffWwrWZM79au5Y2N_L54tmx50pOMqtYh_NKp2T_Y2YnRLECYZxfLHGGsfynOV5ahaQLcQdUAkkAKoBooQF0pwHwaQAFiQDNIeoSoLAjh4RDrEDFkEjQsanBnyFVEo42TQoiH7Sl40OUEDJ1t0AEsRg32SE6EEUGWIAobHu_plJi5RgNmQwhQpZka1wEGDGTaNCCdmIQb5JaCRlpCsN2B3RkcGLQvmEyAjVZ823GJx6Rqk8PvkyEFrOx4F1kfopvNEH6Q_yAZDL4-AMFlIYcaiOY4kuIsVETgHJEnsU30mnPkItRe1P8kJhBykgp9mgsgy-MRAE1k7ZlexWm9S9_6pprWysuXV81iz2VNVAUEWnRMNBYMMnaX6rXskehveukcW1CeyHSUasZYFRLVpPSpJPbZC5Ofjov2fyk-6GM5M37nh7pkEqWYkiJJXZLx0h0eDDtYQRzlkn0BWnbxMNWgGtuKGgn7GPSP5SATx1O8EfpBtsnsQVlp2olnFNSy6lDi941ut9koaxvJrgWNotuo1mbM4AUcPd48dEx7WGYNt7iabzO5QvO-SZcnIusmBedmV52yVFLq39-vB70vwz6u4N-f9B_MXz7bbiz93t_e_Ru7-D5_vDl9sGHN4Otr6Odn6NX3wdbn4a7n4fvP152VrrJcmfRbW5AcXss4J5b5lUpWYEP41ldFgGTXllUgadqX7Ci1qXQ6GN7eVhXdGEO45XKRCUxyskVz2RwxZldf7ReXXXm0NZWnNXKK3XOi1xmRa4D1C5WVzXPimtOxwqaPrZpbtKTTPP1U6FywzlH35hd6bzpzG482axuoe-_kd82r89fXsfSmg |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IV%EF%BC%8E%E3%83%AD%E3%83%9C%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E6%94%AF%E6%8F%B4%E4%B8%8B%E7%9B%B4%E8%85%B8%E6%89%8B%E8%A1%93%E3%81%AE%E7%8F%BE%E7%8A%B6%E3%81%A8%E6%9C%AA%E6%9D%A5&rft.jtitle=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%A4%A7%E8%85%B8%E8%82%9B%E9%96%80%E7%97%85%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A%E9%9B%91%E8%AA%8C&rft.au=%E6%9D%BE%E5%B1%B1%2C+%E8%B2%B4%E4%BF%8A&rft.au=%E4%B8%AD%E5%B3%B6%2C+%E5%BA%B7%E6%99%83&rft.au=%E7%B5%B9%E7%AC%A0%2C+%E7%A5%90%E4%BB%8B&rft.au=%E5%BE%B3%E6%B0%B8%2C+%E6%AD%A3%E5%89%87&rft.date=2019&rft.pub=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%A4%A7%E8%85%B8%E8%82%9B%E9%96%80%E7%97%85%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=0047-1801&rft.eissn=1882-9619&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=574&rft_id=info:doi/10.3862%2Fjcoloproctology.72.567&rft.externalDocID=article_jcoloproctology_72_10_72_567_article_char_ja |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0047-1801&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0047-1801&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0047-1801&client=summon |