CHOLECYSTECTOMY BY THE MINIMAL-ACCESS APPROACH: MINILAPAROTOMY AND LAPAROSCOPY

There is a tendency to limit the operative scars as small as possible nowadays and to reduce patient's physical and psychological pain. We analysed 13 patients; 3 managed by minil aparotomy, and 10 by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LSC). The length of skin incision in minilaparotomy was longer a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of National Medical Services Vol. 45; no. 12; pp. 1199 - 1204
Main Authors NISHINA, Takuya, MANABE, Kohji, GOTOH, Kiyotoshi, KAWAGUCHI, Kenji, OHNO, Satoshi, ARATA, Atushi, MAKINO, Yasuhiro, KOBAYASHI, Gensoh, TAKEUCHI, Hitoshi, KONAGA, Eiji, KANAOKA, Yuji, KASHITANI, Masaaki, KOHNO, Hiroshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society of National Medical Services 1991
一般社団法人 国立医療学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-1699
1884-8729
DOI10.11261/iryo1946.45.1199

Cover

More Information
Summary:There is a tendency to limit the operative scars as small as possible nowadays and to reduce patient's physical and psychological pain. We analysed 13 patients; 3 managed by minil aparotomy, and 10 by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LSC). The length of skin incision in minilaparotomy was longer according to the obesity index. There was no significant difference between the two methods in operative time. The patients were offered less pain, faster recovery, and improved cosmetic results by the seprocedures, especially by LSC. Complication occurred in one case of LSC. To avoidserious comprications, it is most important to decide the indication properly with imaging diagnosis, and to convert to open cholecystetomy early in difficult cases.
ISSN:0021-1699
1884-8729
DOI:10.11261/iryo1946.45.1199