Clinical implication of plasma lysophosphatidylcholine in type 2 diabetics

The increase in circulating peroxide lipids is considered as a promoting factor of atherosclerotic disease, because peroxide lipids in the subendothelial space directly induce formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Recently, lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and oxidative low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of Clinical Chemistry Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 49 - 60
Main Authors Arii, Kaoru, Suehiro, Tadashi, Kumon, Yoshitaka, Sugiura, Tetsuro, Hashimoto, Kozo, Yamanaka, Shigeo, Ikeda, Yukio
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry 2007
一般社団法人 日本臨床化学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0370-5633
2187-4077
DOI10.14921/jscc1971b.36.1_49

Cover

More Information
Summary:The increase in circulating peroxide lipids is considered as a promoting factor of atherosclerotic disease, because peroxide lipids in the subendothelial space directly induce formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Recently, lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and oxidative low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) have been measured as biological markers of atherosclerosis. To clarify the clinical implication of the measurement of LPC, plasma concentrations of LPC and also oxLDL and high-sensitivity C-reactive proteins (hs-CRP) were measured in 147 patients with type 2 diabetes, and these measurements were compared in relationship to clinical characteristics and diabetic vascular complications. LPC concentration was also investigated in 24 healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females) as a reference of circulation LPC values. Plasm a LPC concentration in male type 2 diabetics (mean ± standard deviation, 0.221 ± 0.059 mmo1/1) was lower than that in female diabetics (0.202 ± 0.055). This gender difference in plasma LPC concentration was also confirmed in healthy subjects (males 0.256 ± 0.048, and females 0.220 ± 0.031). Plasma oxLDL had a good correlation with plasma LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in diabetics, and oxLDL concentration in female diabetics (55.3 ± 17.3 U/1) was significantly higher than that in male diabetics (48.9 ± 14.8). There was no significant correlation between LPC and oxLDL concentrations. LPC and oxLDL did not correlate with hs-CRP in diabetics. As for diabetic complications, plasma LPC in diabetics with ischemic heart disease (IHD) was lower (0.179 ± 0.057) than that without IHD (0220 ± 0.049). Plasma LPC in diabetics with macroangiopathy (cerebral infarction, IHD and arteriosclerosis obliterans 0.195 ± 0.054) was also lower than that without macroangiopathy (0.222 ± 0.059). In males and females plasma LPC in diabetics with macroangiopathy or IHD was lower than those without macroangiopathy or IHDrespectively. hs-CRP was significantly higher in diabetics with IHD (4.77 ± 7.27 mg/l) than those without IHD (1.99 ± 4.86). However, there was no significant difference in oxLDL between those with and without complications. hs-CRP and oxLDL have been considered to be useful markers to detect vascular complications. However, our results suggest that LPC was equal or superior hs-CRP and oxLDL in detecting vascular complications in type 2 diabetics.
ISSN:0370-5633
2187-4077
DOI:10.14921/jscc1971b.36.1_49