オマーンオフィオライトマントルダイアピル粗粒カンラン岩の微細構造解析:海洋リソスフェアの地震波異方性への示唆

Petrophysical characteristics of coarse-granular peridotites in a mantle diapir beneath the mid-ocean ridge have been quantitatively compared with those in a common lithospheric mantle peridotites outcropped in the Oman ophiolite. Maqsad mantle section has subvertical structures known to be a mantle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in日本地質学会学術大会講演要旨 p. 056
Main Authors 道林, 克禎, 大家, 翔馬, 柿畑, 優季, 小田島, 庸浩, 尾上, 彩佳
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published 一般社団法人 日本地質学会 2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1348-3935
2187-6665
DOI10.14863/geosocabst.2021.0_056

Cover

More Information
Summary:Petrophysical characteristics of coarse-granular peridotites in a mantle diapir beneath the mid-ocean ridge have been quantitatively compared with those in a common lithospheric mantle peridotites outcropped in the Oman ophiolite. Maqsad mantle section has subvertical structures known to be a mantle diapir, whereas Hilti mantle section is characterized by the subhorizontal structure subparallel to the crust-mantle boundary, presumably a fragment of typical oceanic lithosphere at some distance from the ridge. Despite of the fact that the attitude of foliation and lineation are very different each other, both peridotites have similar textures and grain sizes but slightly different features in olivine crystal-preferred orientations (CPOs). Maqsad peridotites vary from axial [010] patterns (AG type) to (010)[100] patterns (A type), whereas Hilti peridotites are dominated by axial [010] patterns (AG type). It may suggest that the olivine CPOs could have been formed during vertical plastic flow in the mantle diapir and were somehow modified during subsequent horizontal plastic flow under subsolidus conditions. Furthermore, the azimuthal anisotropy would vary in dependent on the structural orientations as well as olivine CPOs, even though actual Vp anisotropies are nearly constant in both peridotites.
Bibliography:R1-O-1
ISSN:1348-3935
2187-6665
DOI:10.14863/geosocabst.2021.0_056