Long-Term Efficacy of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study for Repetitive Sphenopalatine Blockade With Bupivacaine vs Saline With the Tx360® Device for Treatment of Chronic Migraine
Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygo...
Saved in:
Published in | Headache Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 529 - 542 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0017-8748 1526-4610 |
DOI | 10.1111/head.12546 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360® device, which was an effective and well‐tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM.
Methods
This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders‐II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360® twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript include post‐treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures.
Results
The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end‐point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end‐points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post‐treatment (Mdiff = −5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff = −1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff = −5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff = −4.78) post‐treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff = −2.08, Mdiff = −1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post‐treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal.
Conclusions
Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long‐term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360® device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360 device, which was an effective and well-tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM.
This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders-II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360 twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end-points reported in this manuscript include post-treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures.
The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end-point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end-points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end-points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post-treatment (Mdiff = -5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff = -1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff = -5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff = -4.78) post-treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff = -2.08, Mdiff = -1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post-treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal.
Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long-term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360 device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted. Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360 device, which was an effective and well-tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM. Methods This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders-II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360 twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end-points reported in this manuscript include post-treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures. Results The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end-point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end-points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end-points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post-treatment (Mdiff=-5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff=-1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff=-5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff=-4.78) post-treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff=-2.08, Mdiff=-1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post-treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal. Conclusions Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long-term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360 device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted. Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360® device, which was an effective and well‐tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM. Methods This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders‐II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360® twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript include post‐treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures. Results The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end‐point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end‐points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post‐treatment (Mdiff = −5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff = −1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff = −5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff = −4.78) post‐treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff = −2.08, Mdiff = −1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post‐treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal. Conclusions Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long‐term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360® device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted. BACKGROUNDThis study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360 device, which was an effective and well-tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM.METHODSThis was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders-II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360 twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end-points reported in this manuscript include post-treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures.RESULTSThe final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end-point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end-points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end-points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post-treatment (Mdiff = -5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff = -1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff = -5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff = -4.78) post-treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff = -2.08, Mdiff = -1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post-treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal.CONCLUSIONSData from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long-term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360 device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted. |
Author | Manley, Heather R. Cady, Ryan J. Dexter, Kent Cady, Roger K. Saper, Joel |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 Clinvest Springfield MO USA 2 Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute Ann Arbor MI USA 1 Headache Care Center Springfield MO USA |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute Ann Arbor MI USA – name: 1 Headache Care Center Springfield MO USA – name: 3 Clinvest Springfield MO USA |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Roger K. surname: Cady fullname: Cady, Roger K. email: rcady@headachecare.com organization: Headache Care Center, Springfield, MO, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Joel surname: Saper fullname: Saper, Joel organization: Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute, MI, Ann Arbor, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Kent surname: Dexter fullname: Dexter, Kent organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Ryan J. surname: Cady fullname: Cady, Ryan J. organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Heather R. surname: Manley fullname: Manley, Heather R. organization: Clinvest, MO, Springfield, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25828648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdUsuO0zAUjdAg5gEbPgBZYjMLMtiJaycbpGlapqDy0LRQdpbj3DSeceyQR5nyUXwEC76LpB0qwBtf-Tx8LJ9T78g6C573lOAL0q-XBcjsggQjyh54J2QUMJ8ygo-8E4wJ9yNOo2PvtGluMMaUxeyRdxyMoiBiNDrxfs2dXftLqEs0zXOtpNoilyOJJq5LDfhjo232An00UkHq_MTZtnbGQH92LW3mSv0dMrRou2yLcleja6ig1a3eAFpUBVhXSSNbbQGNjVO3MgO00m2Bxl2lN1LJAdk0aCHNMO2gtgC0vAsZ_vkDTWCjFeyclzXItgTbDvmSonZWK_ROr-vB47H3MJemgSf3-5n36fV0mcz8-YerN8nl3Nc0wsyPIxrmisocYgUkAxoqxWNKKQlIwONA0SANFY8IsBxDntKQMkgJ52kcSgjT8Mx7tfeturSETPVxamlEVetS1lvhpBb_IlYXYu02grGIEEp7g_N7g9p97aBpRakbBcZIC65rBGGckjjmHPfU5_9Rb1xX2_55AyvkmIx42LOe_Z3oEOXPF_cEsid80wa2B5xgMZRHDOURu_KI2fRyspt6jb_X6KaFu4NG1rdiuHkkVu-vRBJ8ngVf3q5EEv4GyrLLlg |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. – notice: Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society |
DBID | BSCLL 24P CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7U7 C1K K9. 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1111/head.12546 |
DatabaseName | Istex Wiley Online Library Open Access Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Toxicology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1526-4610 |
EndPage | 542 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6681144 3656951831 25828648 HEAD12546 ark_67375_WNG_C2VH2XJW_C |
Genre | article Multicenter Study Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Tian Medical Inc. |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29I 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AAQQT AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHMBA AI. AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS ECV EJD EMOBN EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FYBCS G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO L7B LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQ9 WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH YUY ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT 24P AAHHS ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF ESX NPM PKN WRC YCJ 7TK 7U7 C1K K9. 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i4806-9843fc4afe9ce1de43cc794441212792c42b3c781e6f0efb4346eb177b93ae3b3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0017-8748 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:45:25 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:57:15 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:53:35 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:33:49 EST 2025 Thu Sep 25 07:36:39 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:18:46 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | sphenopalatine ganglion block episodic migraine chronic migraine Tx360 |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2015 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4806-9843fc4afe9ce1de43cc794441212792c42b3c781e6f0efb4346eb177b93ae3b3 |
Notes | Table S1.-CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomized trial. ArticleID:HEAD12546 Tian Medical Inc. ark:/67375/WNG-C2VH2XJW-C istex:1A0D1969C2FE9CB3CAF76FEE6485AEB03422ED62 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01709708). Financial Support: This research study supported by a grant from Tian Medical Inc. (Lombard, IL, USA). Conflict of Interest: Dr. Roger K. Cady currently serves on several advisory boards: Allergan, Avanir, Boston Scientific, DepoMed, Novartis, OptiNose US Inc., Pfizer, and Zogenix. He also receives research grants from Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers, ElectroCore, Labrys Biologics, OptiNose, Pharmalyte Solutions LLC, Tian Medical LLC, and Vivid Pharma Inc. Dr. Cady provided consulting services for Aerocrine, Allergan, Avanir, Becker Pharma Consulting, Duke University, DepoMed, Evidera, Inc., Impax Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Zogenix. Dr. Joel Saper receives research grants from Achelios, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Electrocore, Innovative Medical Concepts, Labrys Biologics, Neuraxon, Novartis, OptiNose, Osmotica, Pfizer Inc., Tian Medical, and Vanda & Winston Laboratories. Dr. Saper receives consultant/honorarium from Allergan, NuPathe, Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon), Purdue Pharma, Supernus, Medscape, Tian Medical, and Migraine Research Foundation. Dr. Kent Dexter, Ryan J. Cady, and Heather R. Manley have nothing to disclose. Study approved by Sterling Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee. |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4081-8395 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12546 |
PMID | 25828648 |
PQID | 1673701573 |
PQPubID | 24968 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6681144 proquest_miscellaneous_1674199770 proquest_journals_1673701573 pubmed_primary_25828648 wiley_primary_10_1111_head_12546_HEAD12546 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_C2VH2XJW_C |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | April 2015 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2015 text: April 2015 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Mt. Royal – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | Headache |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
References | Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64. Lipton RB. Chronic migraine, classification, differential diagnosis, and epidemiology. Headache. 2011;51(Suppl. 2):77-83. Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, et al. Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population. Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:432-438. BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxinA) Prescribing Information. Irvine, CA: Allergan, Inc.; 2011. Obah C, Fine PG. Intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block: Minimally invasive pharmacotherapy for refractory facial and headache pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20:57-59. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. The prognosis of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008;21:301-308. Stokes M, Becker WJ, Lipton RB, et al. Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Headache. 2011;51:1058-1077. Schreiber CP, Hutchinson S, Webster CJ, Ames M, Richardson MS, Powers C. Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self-reported or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1769-1772. Cady RK, Saper J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with TX360® as acute treatment for chronic migraine. Headache. 2015;55:101-116. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:793-803. Barbanti P, Fabbrini G, Pesare M, Vanacore N, Cerbo R. Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:256-259. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149-1160. Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache or migraine. Neurology. 2002;58:S10-S14. Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778. Katsarava Z, Buse DC, Manack AN, Lipton RB. Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:86-92. Láinez MJ, Puche M, Garcia A, Gascón F. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cluster headache. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014;7:162-168. Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:804-814. Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine (EM) is associated with new-onset chronic migraine (CM): Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Neurology. 2015;84:688-695. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Concepts and mechanisms of migraine chronification. Headache. 2008;48:7-15. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia. 2011;31:301-315. Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label follow-up. Headache. 1999;39:543-551. Haut SR, Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: Focus on epilepsy and migraine. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:148-157. 2009; 12 2002; 58 2004; 164 2009; 41 2006; 20 2013; 16 2011 2015; 84 1999; 39 2011; 51 2015; 55 2002; 22 2011; 31 2008 2008; 48 2006; 5 2008; 21 2012; 16 2013 2014; 7 2010; 30 |
References_xml | – reference: BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxinA) Prescribing Information. Irvine, CA: Allergan, Inc.; 2011. – reference: Barbanti P, Fabbrini G, Pesare M, Vanacore N, Cerbo R. Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:256-259. – reference: Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64. – reference: Bigal ME, Lipton RB. The prognosis of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008;21:301-308. – reference: Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label follow-up. Headache. 1999;39:543-551. – reference: Láinez MJ, Puche M, Garcia A, Gascón F. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cluster headache. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014;7:162-168. – reference: Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:793-803. – reference: Schreiber CP, Hutchinson S, Webster CJ, Ames M, Richardson MS, Powers C. Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self-reported or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1769-1772. – reference: Obah C, Fine PG. Intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block: Minimally invasive pharmacotherapy for refractory facial and headache pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20:57-59. – reference: Cady RK, Saper J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with TX360® as acute treatment for chronic migraine. Headache. 2015;55:101-116. – reference: Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine (EM) is associated with new-onset chronic migraine (CM): Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Neurology. 2015;84:688-695. – reference: Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, et al. Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population. Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:432-438. – reference: Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778. – reference: Stokes M, Becker WJ, Lipton RB, et al. Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Headache. 2011;51:1058-1077. – reference: Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia. 2011;31:301-315. – reference: Haut SR, Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: Focus on epilepsy and migraine. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:148-157. – reference: Katsarava Z, Buse DC, Manack AN, Lipton RB. Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:86-92. – reference: Lipton RB. Chronic migraine, classification, differential diagnosis, and epidemiology. Headache. 2011;51(Suppl. 2):77-83. – reference: Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149-1160. – reference: Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache or migraine. Neurology. 2002;58:S10-S14. – reference: Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:804-814. – reference: Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Concepts and mechanisms of migraine chronification. Headache. 2008;48:7-15. – year: 2011 – volume: 5 start-page: 148 year: 2006 end-page: 157 article-title: Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: Focus on epilepsy and migraine publication-title: Lancet Neurol – volume: 48 start-page: 7 year: 2008 end-page: 15 article-title: Concepts and mechanisms of migraine chronification publication-title: Headache – volume: 84 start-page: 688 year: 2015 end-page: 695 article-title: Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine (EM) is associated with new‐onset chronic migraine (CM): Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study publication-title: Neurology – volume: 51 start-page: 77 issue: Suppl. 2 year: 2011 end-page: 83 article-title: Chronic migraine, classification, differential diagnosis, and epidemiology publication-title: Headache – volume: 16 start-page: 86 year: 2012 end-page: 92 article-title: Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine publication-title: Curr Pain Headache Rep – volume: 21 start-page: 301 year: 2008 end-page: 308 article-title: The prognosis of migraine publication-title: Curr Opin Neurol – volume: 20 start-page: 57 year: 2006 end-page: 59 article-title: Intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block: Minimally invasive pharmacotherapy for refractory facial and headache pain publication-title: J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother – volume: 41 start-page: 1149 year: 2009 end-page: 1160 article-title: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses publication-title: Behav Res Methods – volume: 22 start-page: 432 year: 2002 end-page: 438 article-title: Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population. Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 51 start-page: 1058 year: 2011 end-page: 1077 article-title: Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS) publication-title: Headache – volume: 12 start-page: 55 year: 2009 end-page: 64 article-title: The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis publication-title: Value Health – volume: 30 start-page: 804 year: 2010 end-page: 814 article-title: OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 16 start-page: E769 year: 2013 end-page: E778 article-title: A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain publication-title: Pain Physician – volume: 55 start-page: 101 year: 2015 end-page: 116 article-title: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with TX360® as acute treatment for chronic migraine publication-title: Headache – volume: 22 start-page: 256 year: 2002 end-page: 259 article-title: Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 31 start-page: 301 year: 2011 end-page: 315 article-title: Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS) publication-title: Cephalalgia – start-page: 1054 year: 2011 end-page: 1061 – volume: 164 start-page: 1769 year: 2004 end-page: 1772 article-title: Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self‐reported or physician‐diagnosed “sinus” headache publication-title: Arch Intern Med – volume: 30 start-page: 793 year: 2010 end-page: 803 article-title: OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double‐blind, randomized placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 7 start-page: 162 year: 2014 end-page: 168 article-title: Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cluster headache publication-title: Ther Adv Neurol Disord – volume: 58 start-page: S10 year: 2002 end-page: S14 article-title: Sinus headache or migraine publication-title: Neurology – volume: 39 start-page: 543 year: 1999 end-page: 551 article-title: Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open‐label follow‐up publication-title: Headache – start-page: 315 year: 2008 end-page: 377 – year: 2013 |
SSID | ssj0004696 |
Score | 2.331384 |
Snippet | Background
This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in... This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term... Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in... BACKGROUNDThis study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed wiley istex |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 529 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Bupivacaine - administration & dosage Catheterization - instrumentation Catheterization - methods Chronic Disease chronic migraine Double-Blind Method Drug Administration Schedule Drug Delivery Systems - instrumentation Drug Delivery Systems - methods episodic migraine Female Headaches Humans Male Middle Aged Migraine Migraine Disorders - diagnosis Migraine Disorders - drug therapy Pain Measurement - drug effects Pain Measurement - methods Pilot Projects Quality of life Research Submission Research Submissions Sodium Chloride - administration & dosage sphenopalatine ganglion block Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block - methods Studies Time Factors Treatment Outcome Tx360 Young Adult |
Title | Long-Term Efficacy of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study for Repetitive Sphenopalatine Blockade With Bupivacaine vs Saline With the Tx360® Device for Treatment of Chronic Migraine |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-C2VH2XJW-C/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12546 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25828648 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1673701573 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1674199770 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6681144 |
Volume | 55 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 0017-8748 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19970101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1526-4610 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004696 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dbtMwFLbGLhA3_P8ExmQkxAUiU2K7TiJxs3Yd1USnaetob1BkO84WdSTT2k7brngEnoSH4Jqn4Ek4x0lLB9zAXeTjOE50zsln-_NnQl6GJgt0zpkvVRj7QueJrxJhfZ5xC_iBBcZN5vR3Ze9Q7IxaoxXydr4XptaHWEy4YWS4fI0BrvRkKcjxDPuNEOXcIQGHvOXWaPfZ0qZIdzhXnYYjETfapEjj-XUrQFL8mhd_w5d_0iSX4av7_2zfIR_nPa9pJ-ON2VRvmKvfRB3_99XuktsNMKWbtSfdIyu2vE9u9pul9wfk-_uqPPrx-csAUjntovCEMpe0yqmiAML1iQVbGx6dvaF7ODWvKyjo1ET4Ewul-6rMqk_Flc0okhcvKcBlCvgft7lByqUHyDaDITyS80pL2_CXHavM0mExPabt2WlxroxCy_mEHih8ydoECJYOLrgMvn2lWxYTn2t5MGfQYx8bCWDaL47wSAz7kBxudwednt8cBeEXIg6kn8SC50ao3CbGhpkV3BjIJIDlUKE-YUYwzU0Uh1bmgc214EJaVNbSCVeWa_6IrJZVaZ8QmikZBXmYW6mVEEmodQyNKia1lUyrlkdeOZdIT2u5j1SdjZH9FrXS4e67tMM-9NhoZ5h2PLI295m0CfxJGmJNgFgR98iLhRlCFtdhVGmrmasjkN8TBR55XLvY4mEMlzGliD0SXXO-RQWUA79uKYtjJwsuZQyDW-GR1863FnfMh3noVanzqrTX3dxyV0__pfIzcgvgYqvmLa2R1enZzD4HSDbV6-QGE3vrLgB_AkkFOnM |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELagSMAF8U-ggJEQB0RQEnud5NjdblnK7qqiKbu3yE4mbdSSVO1u1XLiEXgSHoIzT8GTMONkl63gwi3yOL-emXy2P39m7KWf5Z4pROAq7UeuNEXs6liCK3IBiB8CL7ODOaOxGuzJ7Wln2nJzaC1Mow-xHHCjyLD5mgKcBqRXopw2sX_rk577VXZNqsAjpw7kzsqySLs9V5OIQxm16qRE5PlzLoJS-p7n_0KYfxMlVwGs_QNt3Wa3WujIN5q2vsOuQHWXXR-1k-P32M9hXe3_-votwWTL-yQNobMLXhdcc4TJ5gjQ1sX3zt_wHRo8NzUW9Bqq-hFg6Udd5fXn8gvknOiFFxwBLUeETgvRMCnyXeKDYSeb6HMV8C7-Bw91DnxSzg54d35cnulMk-XslO9q-sKNCTEmT86F8n5855tAqcleOVlw3OkZW5FePir3adMKuM_2tvpJb-C2mzW4pYw85caRFEUmdQFxBn4OUmQZxjqiLdKQj4NMBkZkYeSDKjwojBRSAWlfmVhoEEY8YGtVXcEjxnOtQq_wC1BGSxn7xkR4UR0oAyowuuOwV7bJ0uNGkCPVJ4fETws76WT8Lu0FnwbBdHuS9hy2vmjTtA3N09SnmgiCQuGwF0szBhXNlOgK6rmtI4mBE3oOe9i4wPJmAU00Khk5LLzkHMsKJNh92VKVB1a4W6kIu5_SYa-tGy3PWHTEyCtT65XpoL-xaY8e_0_l5-zGIBkN0-H78Ycn7CaCu07DMlpna7OTOTxFADUzz2yY_AbgUhyu |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtNAEF6VIlVcKP-4FFgkxAHhyPZu1rbEpfkjlCaq2pTkUlm79rq1UuyoTaq2Jx6BJ-EhOPMUPAkzayekwAVulmdtr62Z8Te7335LyEs3ThyVMs8W0g1srtLQliHXNkuYBvzgObEZzOn1RfeAb4_qoxXydr4WptSHWAy4YWSYfI0BPknSpSDHPexrLsq53yA3uYDyCiHRnre0KtLszlXmYZ8HlTgp8nh-XQuYFD_nxd8A5p88yWX8an5AnXVyOO96yTsZ12ZTVYuvflN1_N93u0NuV8iUbpWudJes6PweWetVc-_3yfedIj_68fnLAHI5baPyhIwvaZFSSQGFqxMNtgY8OnlDd3FsXhVwolky4U80nN2TeVJ8yq50QpG9eEkBL1MoAHCdG-Rcuo90M6jhkZ2Xa9qA3-xYJpoOs-kxbcwm2bmMJVrOz-i-xJcsTQBh6eCCCefbV9rSmPnMnQdzCj32sdIApr3sCPfE0A_IQac9aHbtai8IO-OBI-ww4CyNuUx1GGs30ZzFMaQSAHMoUR96MfcUi_3A1SJ1dKo440KjtJYKmdRMsYdkNS9y_ZjQRArfSd1UCyU5D12lArip9ITSwlOybpFXxiWiSan3EcnTMdLf_Ho07L-Lmt7HrjfaHkZNi2zOfSaqIv8scrElYCyfWeTFwgwxixMxMtfFzLThSPDxHYs8Kl1s8TAP5zEFDyziX3O-RQPUA79uybNjowsuRADVLbfIa-NbiyvmdR56VWS8Kuq2t1rmaONfGj8na7utTrTzvv_hCbkF0LFecpg2yer0dKafAjybqmcmCn8CeJU8Zw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term+Efficacy+of+a+Double-Blind%2C+Placebo-Controlled%2C+Randomized+Study+for+Repetitive+Sphenopalatine+Blockade+With+Bupivacaine+vs+Saline+With+the+Tx360%C2%AE+Device+for+Treatment+of+Chronic+Migraine&rft.jtitle=Headache&rft.au=Cady%2C+Roger+K.&rft.au=Saper%2C+Joel&rft.au=Dexter%2C+Kent&rft.au=Cady%2C+Ryan+J.&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0017-8748&rft.eissn=1526-4610&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fhead.12546&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_C2VH2XJW_C |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |