Long-Term Efficacy of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study for Repetitive Sphenopalatine Blockade With Bupivacaine vs Saline With the Tx360® Device for Treatment of Chronic Migraine

Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeadache Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 529 - 542
Main Authors Cady, Roger K., Saper, Joel, Dexter, Kent, Cady, Ryan J., Manley, Heather R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0017-8748
1526-4610
DOI10.1111/head.12546

Cover

Abstract Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360® device, which was an effective and well‐tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM. Methods This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders‐II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360® twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript include post‐treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures. Results The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end‐point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end‐points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post‐treatment (Mdiff = −5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff = −1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff = −5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff = −4.78) post‐treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff = −2.08, Mdiff = −1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post‐treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal. Conclusions Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long‐term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360® device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted.
AbstractList This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360 device, which was an effective and well-tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM. This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders-II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360 twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end-points reported in this manuscript include post-treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures. The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end-point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end-points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end-points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post-treatment (Mdiff  = -5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff  = -1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff  = -5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff  = -4.78) post-treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff  = -2.08, Mdiff  = -1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post-treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal. Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long-term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360 device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted.
Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360 device, which was an effective and well-tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM. Methods This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders-II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360 twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end-points reported in this manuscript include post-treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures. Results The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end-point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end-points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end-points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post-treatment (Mdiff=-5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff=-1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff=-5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff=-4.78) post-treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff=-2.08, Mdiff=-1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post-treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal. Conclusions Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long-term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360 device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted.
Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360® device, which was an effective and well‐tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM. Methods This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders‐II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360® twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript include post‐treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures. Results The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end‐point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end‐points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post‐treatment (Mdiff = −5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff = −1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff = −5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff = −4.78) post‐treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff = −2.08, Mdiff = −1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post‐treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal. Conclusions Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long‐term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360® device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted.
BACKGROUNDThis study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360 device, which was an effective and well-tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM.METHODSThis was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders-II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360 twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end-points reported in this manuscript include post-treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures.RESULTSThe final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end-point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end-points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end-points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post-treatment (Mdiff  = -5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff  = -1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff  = -5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff  = -4.78) post-treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff  = -2.08, Mdiff  = -1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post-treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal.CONCLUSIONSData from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long-term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360 device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted.
Author Manley, Heather R.
Cady, Ryan J.
Dexter, Kent
Cady, Roger K.
Saper, Joel
AuthorAffiliation 3 Clinvest Springfield MO USA
2 Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute Ann Arbor MI USA
1 Headache Care Center Springfield MO USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute Ann Arbor MI USA
– name: 1 Headache Care Center Springfield MO USA
– name: 3 Clinvest Springfield MO USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Roger K.
  surname: Cady
  fullname: Cady, Roger K.
  email: rcady@headachecare.com
  organization: Headache Care Center, Springfield, MO, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Joel
  surname: Saper
  fullname: Saper, Joel
  organization: Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute, MI, Ann Arbor, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kent
  surname: Dexter
  fullname: Dexter, Kent
  organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ryan J.
  surname: Cady
  fullname: Cady, Ryan J.
  organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Heather R.
  surname: Manley
  fullname: Manley, Heather R.
  organization: Clinvest, MO, Springfield, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25828648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdUsuO0zAUjdAg5gEbPgBZYjMLMtiJaycbpGlapqDy0LRQdpbj3DSeceyQR5nyUXwEC76LpB0qwBtf-Tx8LJ9T78g6C573lOAL0q-XBcjsggQjyh54J2QUMJ8ygo-8E4wJ9yNOo2PvtGluMMaUxeyRdxyMoiBiNDrxfs2dXftLqEs0zXOtpNoilyOJJq5LDfhjo232An00UkHq_MTZtnbGQH92LW3mSv0dMrRou2yLcleja6ig1a3eAFpUBVhXSSNbbQGNjVO3MgO00m2Bxl2lN1LJAdk0aCHNMO2gtgC0vAsZ_vkDTWCjFeyclzXItgTbDvmSonZWK_ROr-vB47H3MJemgSf3-5n36fV0mcz8-YerN8nl3Nc0wsyPIxrmisocYgUkAxoqxWNKKQlIwONA0SANFY8IsBxDntKQMkgJ52kcSgjT8Mx7tfeturSETPVxamlEVetS1lvhpBb_IlYXYu02grGIEEp7g_N7g9p97aBpRakbBcZIC65rBGGckjjmHPfU5_9Rb1xX2_55AyvkmIx42LOe_Z3oEOXPF_cEsid80wa2B5xgMZRHDOURu_KI2fRyspt6jb_X6KaFu4NG1rdiuHkkVu-vRBJ8ngVf3q5EEv4GyrLLlg
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.
Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.
– notice: Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society
DBID BSCLL
24P
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
7U7
C1K
K9.
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1111/head.12546
DatabaseName Istex
Wiley Online Library Open Access
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Toxicology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1526-4610
EndPage 542
ExternalDocumentID PMC6681144
3656951831
25828648
HEAD12546
ark_67375_WNG_C2VH2XJW_C
Genre article
Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Tian Medical Inc.
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29I
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQQT
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHMBA
AI.
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
ECV
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FYBCS
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
L7B
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQ9
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
YUY
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
24P
AAHHS
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
ESX
NPM
PKN
WRC
YCJ
7TK
7U7
C1K
K9.
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-i4806-9843fc4afe9ce1de43cc794441212792c42b3c781e6f0efb4346eb177b93ae3b3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0017-8748
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:45:25 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:57:15 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:53:35 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:33:49 EST 2025
Thu Sep 25 07:36:39 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:18:46 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords sphenopalatine ganglion block
episodic migraine
chronic migraine
Tx360
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2015 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4806-9843fc4afe9ce1de43cc794441212792c42b3c781e6f0efb4346eb177b93ae3b3
Notes Table S1.-CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomized trial.
ArticleID:HEAD12546
Tian Medical Inc.
ark:/67375/WNG-C2VH2XJW-C
istex:1A0D1969C2FE9CB3CAF76FEE6485AEB03422ED62
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01709708).
Financial Support: This research study supported by a grant from Tian Medical Inc. (Lombard, IL, USA).
Conflict of Interest: Dr. Roger K. Cady currently serves on several advisory boards: Allergan, Avanir, Boston Scientific, DepoMed, Novartis, OptiNose US Inc., Pfizer, and Zogenix. He also receives research grants from Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers, ElectroCore, Labrys Biologics, OptiNose, Pharmalyte Solutions LLC, Tian Medical LLC, and Vivid Pharma Inc. Dr. Cady provided consulting services for Aerocrine, Allergan, Avanir, Becker Pharma Consulting, Duke University, DepoMed, Evidera, Inc., Impax Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Zogenix.
Dr. Joel Saper receives research grants from Achelios, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Electrocore, Innovative Medical Concepts, Labrys Biologics, Neuraxon, Novartis, OptiNose, Osmotica, Pfizer Inc., Tian Medical, and Vanda & Winston Laboratories. Dr. Saper receives consultant/honorarium from Allergan, NuPathe, Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon), Purdue Pharma, Supernus, Medscape, Tian Medical, and Migraine Research Foundation. Dr. Kent Dexter, Ryan J. Cady, and Heather R. Manley have nothing to disclose.
Study approved by Sterling Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee.
ORCID 0000-0003-4081-8395
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12546
PMID 25828648
PQID 1673701573
PQPubID 24968
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6681144
proquest_miscellaneous_1674199770
proquest_journals_1673701573
pubmed_primary_25828648
wiley_primary_10_1111_head_12546_HEAD12546
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_C2VH2XJW_C
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate April 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2015
  text: April 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Mt. Royal
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Headache
PublicationTitleAlternate Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64.
Lipton RB. Chronic migraine, classification, differential diagnosis, and epidemiology. Headache. 2011;51(Suppl. 2):77-83.
Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, et al. Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population. Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:432-438.
BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxinA) Prescribing Information. Irvine, CA: Allergan, Inc.; 2011.
Obah C, Fine PG. Intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block: Minimally invasive pharmacotherapy for refractory facial and headache pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20:57-59.
Bigal ME, Lipton RB. The prognosis of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008;21:301-308.
Stokes M, Becker WJ, Lipton RB, et al. Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Headache. 2011;51:1058-1077.
Schreiber CP, Hutchinson S, Webster CJ, Ames M, Richardson MS, Powers C. Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self-reported or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1769-1772.
Cady RK, Saper J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with TX360® as acute treatment for chronic migraine. Headache. 2015;55:101-116.
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:793-803.
Barbanti P, Fabbrini G, Pesare M, Vanacore N, Cerbo R. Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:256-259.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149-1160.
Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache or migraine. Neurology. 2002;58:S10-S14.
Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778.
Katsarava Z, Buse DC, Manack AN, Lipton RB. Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:86-92.
Láinez MJ, Puche M, Garcia A, Gascón F. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cluster headache. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014;7:162-168.
Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:804-814.
Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine (EM) is associated with new-onset chronic migraine (CM): Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Neurology. 2015;84:688-695.
Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Concepts and mechanisms of migraine chronification. Headache. 2008;48:7-15.
Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia. 2011;31:301-315.
Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label follow-up. Headache. 1999;39:543-551.
Haut SR, Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: Focus on epilepsy and migraine. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:148-157.
2009; 12
2002; 58
2004; 164
2009; 41
2006; 20
2013; 16
2011
2015; 84
1999; 39
2011; 51
2015; 55
2002; 22
2011; 31
2008
2008; 48
2006; 5
2008; 21
2012; 16
2013
2014; 7
2010; 30
References_xml – reference: BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxinA) Prescribing Information. Irvine, CA: Allergan, Inc.; 2011.
– reference: Barbanti P, Fabbrini G, Pesare M, Vanacore N, Cerbo R. Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:256-259.
– reference: Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64.
– reference: Bigal ME, Lipton RB. The prognosis of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008;21:301-308.
– reference: Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label follow-up. Headache. 1999;39:543-551.
– reference: Láinez MJ, Puche M, Garcia A, Gascón F. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cluster headache. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014;7:162-168.
– reference: Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:793-803.
– reference: Schreiber CP, Hutchinson S, Webster CJ, Ames M, Richardson MS, Powers C. Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self-reported or physician-diagnosed "sinus" headache. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1769-1772.
– reference: Obah C, Fine PG. Intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block: Minimally invasive pharmacotherapy for refractory facial and headache pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2006;20:57-59.
– reference: Cady RK, Saper J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with TX360® as acute treatment for chronic migraine. Headache. 2015;55:101-116.
– reference: Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine (EM) is associated with new-onset chronic migraine (CM): Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Neurology. 2015;84:688-695.
– reference: Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, et al. Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population. Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:432-438.
– reference: Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778.
– reference: Stokes M, Becker WJ, Lipton RB, et al. Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Headache. 2011;51:1058-1077.
– reference: Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia. 2011;31:301-315.
– reference: Haut SR, Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: Focus on epilepsy and migraine. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:148-157.
– reference: Katsarava Z, Buse DC, Manack AN, Lipton RB. Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16:86-92.
– reference: Lipton RB. Chronic migraine, classification, differential diagnosis, and epidemiology. Headache. 2011;51(Suppl. 2):77-83.
– reference: Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149-1160.
– reference: Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache or migraine. Neurology. 2002;58:S10-S14.
– reference: Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:804-814.
– reference: Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Concepts and mechanisms of migraine chronification. Headache. 2008;48:7-15.
– year: 2011
– volume: 5
  start-page: 148
  year: 2006
  end-page: 157
  article-title: Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: Focus on epilepsy and migraine
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
– volume: 48
  start-page: 7
  year: 2008
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Concepts and mechanisms of migraine chronification
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 84
  start-page: 688
  year: 2015
  end-page: 695
  article-title: Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine (EM) is associated with new‐onset chronic migraine (CM): Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study
  publication-title: Neurology
– volume: 51
  start-page: 77
  issue: Suppl. 2
  year: 2011
  end-page: 83
  article-title: Chronic migraine, classification, differential diagnosis, and epidemiology
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 16
  start-page: 86
  year: 2012
  end-page: 92
  article-title: Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine
  publication-title: Curr Pain Headache Rep
– volume: 21
  start-page: 301
  year: 2008
  end-page: 308
  article-title: The prognosis of migraine
  publication-title: Curr Opin Neurol
– volume: 20
  start-page: 57
  year: 2006
  end-page: 59
  article-title: Intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block: Minimally invasive pharmacotherapy for refractory facial and headache pain
  publication-title: J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1149
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1160
  article-title: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses
  publication-title: Behav Res Methods
– volume: 22
  start-page: 432
  year: 2002
  end-page: 438
  article-title: Chronic daily headache in a tertiary care population. Correlation between the International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and proposed revisions of criteria for chronic daily headache
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 51
  start-page: 1058
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1077
  article-title: Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS)
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 12
  start-page: 55
  year: 2009
  end-page: 64
  article-title: The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis
  publication-title: Value Health
– volume: 30
  start-page: 804
  year: 2010
  end-page: 814
  article-title: OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 16
  start-page: E769
  year: 2013
  end-page: E778
  article-title: A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 55
  start-page: 101
  year: 2015
  end-page: 116
  article-title: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of repetitive transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with TX360® as acute treatment for chronic migraine
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 22
  start-page: 256
  year: 2002
  end-page: 259
  article-title: Unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 31
  start-page: 301
  year: 2011
  end-page: 315
  article-title: Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS)
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– start-page: 1054
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1061
– volume: 164
  start-page: 1769
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1772
  article-title: Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self‐reported or physician‐diagnosed “sinus” headache
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
– volume: 30
  start-page: 793
  year: 2010
  end-page: 803
  article-title: OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double‐blind, randomized placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 7
  start-page: 162
  year: 2014
  end-page: 168
  article-title: Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cluster headache
  publication-title: Ther Adv Neurol Disord
– volume: 58
  start-page: S10
  year: 2002
  end-page: S14
  article-title: Sinus headache or migraine
  publication-title: Neurology
– volume: 39
  start-page: 543
  year: 1999
  end-page: 551
  article-title: Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open‐label follow‐up
  publication-title: Headache
– start-page: 315
  year: 2008
  end-page: 377
– year: 2013
SSID ssj0004696
Score 2.331384
Snippet Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in...
This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in long-term...
Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in...
BACKGROUNDThis study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360 device results in...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
wiley
istex
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 529
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Bupivacaine - administration & dosage
Catheterization - instrumentation
Catheterization - methods
Chronic Disease
chronic migraine
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Delivery Systems - instrumentation
Drug Delivery Systems - methods
episodic migraine
Female
Headaches
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Migraine
Migraine Disorders - diagnosis
Migraine Disorders - drug therapy
Pain Measurement - drug effects
Pain Measurement - methods
Pilot Projects
Quality of life
Research Submission
Research Submissions
Sodium Chloride - administration & dosage
sphenopalatine ganglion block
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block - methods
Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tx360
Young Adult
Title Long-Term Efficacy of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study for Repetitive Sphenopalatine Blockade With Bupivacaine vs Saline With the Tx360® Device for Treatment of Chronic Migraine
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-C2VH2XJW-C/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12546
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25828648
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1673701573
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1674199770
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6681144
Volume 55
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 0017-8748
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1526-4610
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004696
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dbtMwFLbGLhA3_P8ExmQkxAUiU2K7TiJxs3Yd1USnaetob1BkO84WdSTT2k7brngEnoSH4Jqn4Ek4x0lLB9zAXeTjOE50zsln-_NnQl6GJgt0zpkvVRj7QueJrxJhfZ5xC_iBBcZN5vR3Ze9Q7IxaoxXydr4XptaHWEy4YWS4fI0BrvRkKcjxDPuNEOXcIQGHvOXWaPfZ0qZIdzhXnYYjETfapEjj-XUrQFL8mhd_w5d_0iSX4av7_2zfIR_nPa9pJ-ON2VRvmKvfRB3_99XuktsNMKWbtSfdIyu2vE9u9pul9wfk-_uqPPrx-csAUjntovCEMpe0yqmiAML1iQVbGx6dvaF7ODWvKyjo1ET4Ewul-6rMqk_Flc0okhcvKcBlCvgft7lByqUHyDaDITyS80pL2_CXHavM0mExPabt2WlxroxCy_mEHih8ydoECJYOLrgMvn2lWxYTn2t5MGfQYx8bCWDaL47wSAz7kBxudwednt8cBeEXIg6kn8SC50ao3CbGhpkV3BjIJIDlUKE-YUYwzU0Uh1bmgc214EJaVNbSCVeWa_6IrJZVaZ8QmikZBXmYW6mVEEmodQyNKia1lUyrlkdeOZdIT2u5j1SdjZH9FrXS4e67tMM-9NhoZ5h2PLI295m0CfxJGmJNgFgR98iLhRlCFtdhVGmrmasjkN8TBR55XLvY4mEMlzGliD0SXXO-RQWUA79uKYtjJwsuZQyDW-GR1863FnfMh3noVanzqrTX3dxyV0__pfIzcgvgYqvmLa2R1enZzD4HSDbV6-QGE3vrLgB_AkkFOnM
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELagSMAF8U-ggJEQB0RQEnud5NjdblnK7qqiKbu3yE4mbdSSVO1u1XLiEXgSHoIzT8GTMONkl63gwi3yOL-emXy2P39m7KWf5Z4pROAq7UeuNEXs6liCK3IBiB8CL7ODOaOxGuzJ7Wln2nJzaC1Mow-xHHCjyLD5mgKcBqRXopw2sX_rk577VXZNqsAjpw7kzsqySLs9V5OIQxm16qRE5PlzLoJS-p7n_0KYfxMlVwGs_QNt3Wa3WujIN5q2vsOuQHWXXR-1k-P32M9hXe3_-votwWTL-yQNobMLXhdcc4TJ5gjQ1sX3zt_wHRo8NzUW9Bqq-hFg6Udd5fXn8gvknOiFFxwBLUeETgvRMCnyXeKDYSeb6HMV8C7-Bw91DnxSzg54d35cnulMk-XslO9q-sKNCTEmT86F8n5855tAqcleOVlw3OkZW5FePir3adMKuM_2tvpJb-C2mzW4pYw85caRFEUmdQFxBn4OUmQZxjqiLdKQj4NMBkZkYeSDKjwojBRSAWlfmVhoEEY8YGtVXcEjxnOtQq_wC1BGSxn7xkR4UR0oAyowuuOwV7bJ0uNGkCPVJ4fETws76WT8Lu0FnwbBdHuS9hy2vmjTtA3N09SnmgiCQuGwF0szBhXNlOgK6rmtI4mBE3oOe9i4wPJmAU00Khk5LLzkHMsKJNh92VKVB1a4W6kIu5_SYa-tGy3PWHTEyCtT65XpoL-xaY8e_0_l5-zGIBkN0-H78Ycn7CaCu07DMlpna7OTOTxFADUzz2yY_AbgUhyu
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbtNAEF6VIlVcKP-4FFgkxAHhyPZu1rbEpfkjlCaq2pTkUlm79rq1UuyoTaq2Jx6BJ-EhOPMUPAkzayekwAVulmdtr62Z8Te7335LyEs3ThyVMs8W0g1srtLQliHXNkuYBvzgObEZzOn1RfeAb4_qoxXydr4WptSHWAy4YWSYfI0BPknSpSDHPexrLsq53yA3uYDyCiHRnre0KtLszlXmYZ8HlTgp8nh-XQuYFD_nxd8A5p88yWX8an5AnXVyOO96yTsZ12ZTVYuvflN1_N93u0NuV8iUbpWudJes6PweWetVc-_3yfedIj_68fnLAHI5baPyhIwvaZFSSQGFqxMNtgY8OnlDd3FsXhVwolky4U80nN2TeVJ8yq50QpG9eEkBL1MoAHCdG-Rcuo90M6jhkZ2Xa9qA3-xYJpoOs-kxbcwm2bmMJVrOz-i-xJcsTQBh6eCCCefbV9rSmPnMnQdzCj32sdIApr3sCPfE0A_IQac9aHbtai8IO-OBI-ww4CyNuUx1GGs30ZzFMaQSAHMoUR96MfcUi_3A1SJ1dKo440KjtJYKmdRMsYdkNS9y_ZjQRArfSd1UCyU5D12lArip9ITSwlOybpFXxiWiSan3EcnTMdLf_Ho07L-Lmt7HrjfaHkZNi2zOfSaqIv8scrElYCyfWeTFwgwxixMxMtfFzLThSPDxHYs8Kl1s8TAP5zEFDyziX3O-RQPUA79uybNjowsuRADVLbfIa-NbiyvmdR56VWS8Kuq2t1rmaONfGj8na7utTrTzvv_hCbkF0LFecpg2yer0dKafAjybqmcmCn8CeJU8Zw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term+Efficacy+of+a+Double-Blind%2C+Placebo-Controlled%2C+Randomized+Study+for+Repetitive+Sphenopalatine+Blockade+With+Bupivacaine+vs+Saline+With+the+Tx360%C2%AE+Device+for+Treatment+of+Chronic+Migraine&rft.jtitle=Headache&rft.au=Cady%2C+Roger+K.&rft.au=Saper%2C+Joel&rft.au=Dexter%2C+Kent&rft.au=Cady%2C+Ryan+J.&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0017-8748&rft.eissn=1526-4610&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fhead.12546&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_C2VH2XJW_C
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon