Long-Term Efficacy of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study for Repetitive Sphenopalatine Blockade With Bupivacaine vs Saline With the Tx360® Device for Treatment of Chronic Migraine
Background This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygo...
Saved in:
Published in | Headache Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 529 - 542 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0017-8748 1526-4610 |
DOI | 10.1111/head.12546 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
This study aims to determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered with the Tx360® device results in long‐term improvement in chronic migraine (CM). The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. In a previous article, these authors reported repetitive SPG blockades with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered by the Tx360® device, which was an effective and well‐tolerated intervention to incrementally decrease baseline headache intensity of subjects with CM.
Methods
This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. A total of 41 subjects were enrolled at two headache specialty clinics in the USA. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by International Classification of Headache Disorders‐II definition. Subjects were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists 2:1 to receive 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively, delivered with the Tx360® twice a week for 6 weeks. Secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript include post‐treatment measures including number of headache days and quality of life measures.
Results
The final data set included 38 subjects: 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. Our primary end‐point for the study, difference in numeric pain rating scale scores, was met and reported in a previous article. The supplemental secondary end‐points reported in this manuscript did not reach statistical significance. When looking collectively at these end‐points, trends were noticed and worthy of reporting. Subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a decrease in the number of headache days 1 month post‐treatment (Mdiff = −5.71), whereas those receiving saline only saw a slight improvement (Mdiff = −1.93). Headache Impact Test 6 scores were decreased in the bupivacaine group at 1 month (Mdiff = −5.13) and 6 months (Mdiff = −4.78) post‐treatment, but only a modest reduction was seen for those receiving saline at 1 and 6 months, respectively (Mdiff = −2.08, Mdiff = −1.58). Furthermore, subjects receiving bupivacaine reported a reduction in acute medication usage and improved quality of life measures (average pain in the previous 24 hours, mood, normal work, and general activity) up to 6 months post‐treatment. The changes in these measures for the saline group were minimal.
Conclusions
Data from this exploratory pilot study suggest that there may be long‐term clinical benefits with the use of repetitive SPG blockades with bupivacaine delivered with the simple to use Tx360® device. These include a sustained reduction of headache days and improvement in several important quality of life assessments. The SPG blockades were not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on SPG blockade is warranted. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Table S1.-CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomized trial. ArticleID:HEAD12546 Tian Medical Inc. ark:/67375/WNG-C2VH2XJW-C istex:1A0D1969C2FE9CB3CAF76FEE6485AEB03422ED62 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01709708). Financial Support: This research study supported by a grant from Tian Medical Inc. (Lombard, IL, USA). Conflict of Interest: Dr. Roger K. Cady currently serves on several advisory boards: Allergan, Avanir, Boston Scientific, DepoMed, Novartis, OptiNose US Inc., Pfizer, and Zogenix. He also receives research grants from Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers, ElectroCore, Labrys Biologics, OptiNose, Pharmalyte Solutions LLC, Tian Medical LLC, and Vivid Pharma Inc. Dr. Cady provided consulting services for Aerocrine, Allergan, Avanir, Becker Pharma Consulting, Duke University, DepoMed, Evidera, Inc., Impax Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Zogenix. Dr. Joel Saper receives research grants from Achelios, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Electrocore, Innovative Medical Concepts, Labrys Biologics, Neuraxon, Novartis, OptiNose, Osmotica, Pfizer Inc., Tian Medical, and Vanda & Winston Laboratories. Dr. Saper receives consultant/honorarium from Allergan, NuPathe, Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon), Purdue Pharma, Supernus, Medscape, Tian Medical, and Migraine Research Foundation. Dr. Kent Dexter, Ryan J. Cady, and Heather R. Manley have nothing to disclose. Study approved by Sterling Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee. |
ISSN: | 0017-8748 1526-4610 |
DOI: | 10.1111/head.12546 |