Efficacy of phenytoin, valproic acid, carbamazepine and new antiepileptic drugs on control of late-onset post-stroke epilepsy in Taiwan
Background and purpose To assess the efficacy of various antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for controlling post‐stroke epilepsy. Methods This nationwide cohort study was conducted by using data from 2004 to 2008 on new occurrence of post‐stroke epilepsy obtained from the National Health Insurance Research...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of neurology Vol. 22; no. 11; pp. 1459 - 1468 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2015
John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1351-5101 1468-1331 1468-1331 |
DOI | 10.1111/ene.12766 |
Cover
Summary: | Background and purpose
To assess the efficacy of various antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for controlling post‐stroke epilepsy.
Methods
This nationwide cohort study was conducted by using data from 2004 to 2008 on new occurrence of post‐stroke epilepsy obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The examined AEDs were phenytoin (PHT), valproic acid (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ) and new AEDs. Recurrent seizures requiring either emergency room (ER) visits or hospitalization were used to measure the efficacy of seizure control. The Kaplan−Meier failure curve and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to compare the risk of seizure recurrence in patients taking various AEDs.
Results
In all, 3622 late‐onset post‐stroke epilepsy patients were selected. Overall, 1.05 and 0.70 recurrent seizure incidences occurred per 100 person‐months based on ER visits [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.15] and hospitalizations (95% CI 0.62–0.78), respectively. The incidences of ER visits for patients using different AEDs were 1.26, 0.70, 0.43 and 0.38 per 100 person‐months for PHT, VPA, CBZ and new AEDs, respectively. Compared with patients using PHT, the adjusted hazard ratios for ER visits were 0.56 (95% CI 0.42–0.74; P < 0.001), 0.37 (95% CI 0.18–0.75; P = 0.006) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.15–0.52; P < 0.001) for patients using VPA, CBZ and new AEDs, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios of hospitalizations for seizure recurrence yielded similar results.
Conclusions
This large nationwide, population‐based study demonstrated that late‐onset post‐stroke epilepsy patients using VPA and new AEDs have better seizure control than those using PHT as demonstrated by lower risks of ER visits and hospitalization. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:294B11B7DB89CC5376186376DE5750F6EE706F3A ArticleID:ENE12766 The Health and Clinical Research Data Center at Taipei Medical University ark:/67375/WNG-HJLKHXLN-0 AppendixS1. Disease diagnostic codes for previous and coexisting medical conditions. Appendix S2. Drug compliance analysis of the patients in each AED group. Appendix S3. Incidence of epilepsy ER visits amongst post-stroke seizure patients within the follow-up period (1 year). Appendix S4. Incidence of epilepsy hospitalization amongst post-stroke seizure patients within the follow-up period (1 year). Appendix S5. Incidence of ER visits and hospital admissions for seizure recurrence amongst post-stroke epilepsy patients within the follow-up period (without exclusion of 3-month period post index event). Appendix S6. Unadjusted and adjusted HRs for ER visits and hospital admissions for seizure recurrence amongst post-stroke epilepsy patients (without exclusion of 3-month period post index event). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1351-5101 1468-1331 1468-1331 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ene.12766 |