Comparative effectiveness of hepatic artery based therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background Hepatic artery based therapies (HAT) are offered for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of HAT –hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug‐eluting bead TACE (DEB‐T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of surgical oncology Vol. 111; no. 2; pp. 213 - 220
Main Authors Boehm, Lucas M., Jayakrishnan, Thejus T., Miura, John T., Zacharias, Anthony J., Johnston, Fabian M., Turaga, Kiran K., Gamblin, T. Clark
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-4790
1096-9098
1096-9098
DOI10.1002/jso.23781

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Hepatic artery based therapies (HAT) are offered for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of HAT –hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug‐eluting bead TACE (DEB‐TACE), and Yttrium90 radioembolization (Y‐90) for unresectable ICC. Methods A meta‐analysis was performed using a prospectively registered search strategy at PROSPERO (CRD42013004830) that utilized PubMed (2003–2013). Primary outcome was median overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were tumor response to therapy and toxicity. Results A total of 20 articles (of 793, n = 657 patients) were selected for data extraction. Highest Median OS was observed for HAI (22.8, 95% CI 9.8–35.8) months versus Y90 (13.9, 9.5–18.3) months versus TACE (12.4, 10.9–13.9) months versus DEB‐TACE (12.3, 11–13.5) months. Response to therapy (complete and partial) was highest for HAI (56.9%, 95%CI 41.0–72.8) versus Y90 (27.4%, 17.4–37.5) versus TACE (17.3%, 6.8–27.8). The grade III/IV toxicity (Events per patient) was highest for HAI (0.35, 95% CI 0.22–0.48) versus TACE (0.26, 0.21–0.32) versus DEB‐TACE (0.32, 0.17–0.48). Conclusion For patients with unresectable ICC treated with HAT, HAI offered the best outcomes in terms of tumor response and survival but may be limited by toxicity. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:213–220. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JSO23781
ark:/67375/WNG-4M4LKK57-8
istex:41A89F3F165D04440BC8FE56E8280F8456975038
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.23781