Subject-specific models of susceptibility-induced B0 field variations in breast MRI
Purpose: To rapidly calculate and validate subject‐specific field maps based on the three‐dimensional shape of the bilateral breast volume. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy female volunteers were scanned at 3 Tesla using a multi‐echo sequence that provides water, fat, in‐phase, out‐of‐phase, and f...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 227 - 232 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.01.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.23762 |
Cover
Summary: | Purpose:
To rapidly calculate and validate subject‐specific field maps based on the three‐dimensional shape of the bilateral breast volume.
Materials and Methods:
Ten healthy female volunteers were scanned at 3 Tesla using a multi‐echo sequence that provides water, fat, in‐phase, out‐of‐phase, and field map images. A shape‐specific binary mask was automatically generated to calculate a computed field map using a dipole field model. The measured and computed field maps were compared by visualizing the spatial distribution of the difference field map, the mean absolute error, and the 80% distribution widths of frequency histograms.
Results:
The 10 computed field maps had a mean absolute error of 38 Hz (0.29 ppm) compared with the measured field maps. The average 80% distribution widths for the histograms of all of the computed, measured, and difference field maps are 205 Hz, 233 Hz, and 120 Hz, respectively.
Conclusion:
The computed field maps had substantial overall agreement with the measured field maps, indicating that breast MRI field maps can be computed based on the air–tissue interfaces. These estimates may provide a predictive model for field variations and thus have the potential to improve applications in breast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:227–232. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Richard M. Lucas Foundation; General Electric Healthcare istex:F604C0F3D9899FC118820CE34CC96514447D1F6D ark:/67375/WNG-WDVZWPNC-4 National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship - No. DGE-0645962 ArticleID:JMRI23762 NIH - No. R01 EB009055; No. RR009784 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.23762 |