The impact of biologic therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis from a societal perspective: an analysis based on Italian actual clinical practice
Objective Psoriasis is one of the most common forms of chronic dermatitis, affecting 2–3% of the worldwide population. It has a serious effect on the way patients perceive themselves and others, thereby prejudicing their quality of life and giving rise to a significant deterioration in their psycho‐...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 29; no. 12; pp. 2411 - 2416 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0926-9959 1468-3083 1468-3083 |
DOI | 10.1111/jdv.13307 |
Cover
Summary: | Objective
Psoriasis is one of the most common forms of chronic dermatitis, affecting 2–3% of the worldwide population. It has a serious effect on the way patients perceive themselves and others, thereby prejudicing their quality of life and giving rise to a significant deterioration in their psycho‐physical well‐being; it also poses greater difficulties for them in leading a normal social life, including their ability to conduct a normal working life. All the above‐mentioned issues imply a cost for the society. This study proposes to evaluate the impact on societal costs for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis with biologics (etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab) in the Italian clinical practice.
Method
A prospective observational study has been conducted in 12 specialized centres of the Psocare network, located throughout Italy. Direct and indirect costs (as well as the health‐related quality of life of patients with plaque psoriasis undergoing biologic treatments) have been estimated, while the societal impact has been determined using a cost‐utility approach.
Results
Non‐medical and indirect costs account for as much as 44.97% of the total cost prior to treatment and to 6.59% after treatment, with an overall 71.38% decrease. Adopting a societal perspective in the actual clinical practice of the Italian participating centres, the ICER of biologic therapies for treating plaque psoriasis amounted to €18634.40 per QALY gained – a value far from the €28656.30 obtained by adopting a third‐party payer perspective.
Conclusion
Our study confirms that chronic psoriasis subjects patients to a considerable burden, together with their families and caregivers, stressing how important it is to take the societal perspective into consideration during the appraisal process. Besides, using data derived from Italian actual practice, treatment with biologics shows a noteworthy benefit in social terms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JDV13307 ark:/67375/WNG-NX860CM0-T istex:2D0993CD494A389B5FE03E51661E5C3810B59C4A Pfizer, Italy Conflicts of interest GG has received lecture and/or consultation fees from Pfizer, Actelion, Novartis, Abbvie, MSD, Almirall and Celgene. AP has received fees as speaker or consultant or has received research or educational support for the Dermatology Unit of the Department of Medicine of the University of Padua from Abbott, Almirall, MSD, Janssen‐Cilag, Pfizer, GSK and Leo Pharma. FS has received research and educational grants from Abbott, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Biomarine, BMS, and Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichy Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, MSD Italia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Obi, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Servier, Sigma Tau, Stroder and Teva. GAV has been a speaker, a consultant and/or a member of the Advisory Board for Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen‐Cilag and Leo Pharma. SC has been a consultant and/or a speaker for Merck, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Janssen‐Cilag and Leo Pharma. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 1468-3083 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jdv.13307 |