The impact of biologic therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis from a societal perspective: an analysis based on Italian actual clinical practice

Objective Psoriasis is one of the most common forms of chronic dermatitis, affecting 2–3% of the worldwide population. It has a serious effect on the way patients perceive themselves and others, thereby prejudicing their quality of life and giving rise to a significant deterioration in their psycho‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 29; no. 12; pp. 2411 - 2416
Main Authors Polistena, B., Calzavara-Pinton, P., Altomare, G., Berardesca, E., Girolomoni, G., Martini, P., Peserico, A., Puglisi Guerra, A., Spandonaro, F., Vena Gino, A., Chimenti, S., Ayala, F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0926-9959
1468-3083
1468-3083
DOI10.1111/jdv.13307

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective Psoriasis is one of the most common forms of chronic dermatitis, affecting 2–3% of the worldwide population. It has a serious effect on the way patients perceive themselves and others, thereby prejudicing their quality of life and giving rise to a significant deterioration in their psycho‐physical well‐being; it also poses greater difficulties for them in leading a normal social life, including their ability to conduct a normal working life. All the above‐mentioned issues imply a cost for the society. This study proposes to evaluate the impact on societal costs for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis with biologics (etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab) in the Italian clinical practice. Method A prospective observational study has been conducted in 12 specialized centres of the Psocare network, located throughout Italy. Direct and indirect costs (as well as the health‐related quality of life of patients with plaque psoriasis undergoing biologic treatments) have been estimated, while the societal impact has been determined using a cost‐utility approach. Results Non‐medical and indirect costs account for as much as 44.97% of the total cost prior to treatment and to 6.59% after treatment, with an overall 71.38% decrease. Adopting a societal perspective in the actual clinical practice of the Italian participating centres, the ICER of biologic therapies for treating plaque psoriasis amounted to €18634.40 per QALY gained – a value far from the €28656.30 obtained by adopting a third‐party payer perspective. Conclusion Our study confirms that chronic psoriasis subjects patients to a considerable burden, together with their families and caregivers, stressing how important it is to take the societal perspective into consideration during the appraisal process. Besides, using data derived from Italian actual practice, treatment with biologics shows a noteworthy benefit in social terms.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JDV13307
ark:/67375/WNG-NX860CM0-T
istex:2D0993CD494A389B5FE03E51661E5C3810B59C4A
Pfizer, Italy
Conflicts of interest
GG has received lecture and/or consultation fees from Pfizer, Actelion, Novartis, Abbvie, MSD, Almirall and Celgene. AP has received fees as speaker or consultant or has received research or educational support for the Dermatology Unit of the Department of Medicine of the University of Padua from Abbott, Almirall, MSD, Janssen‐Cilag, Pfizer, GSK and Leo Pharma. FS has received research and educational grants from Abbott, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Biomarine, BMS, and Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichy Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, MSD Italia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Obi, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Servier, Sigma Tau, Stroder and Teva. GAV has been a speaker, a consultant and/or a member of the Advisory Board for Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen‐Cilag and Leo Pharma. SC has been a consultant and/or a speaker for Merck, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Janssen‐Cilag and Leo Pharma.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.13307