Hippocampus and two-way active avoidance conditioning: Contrasting effects of cytotoxic lesion and temporary inactivation
ABSTRACT Hippocampal lesions tend to facilitate two‐way active avoidance (2WAA) conditioning, where rats learn to cross to the opposite side of a conditioning chamber to avoid a tone‐signaled footshock. This classical finding has been suggested to reflect that hippocampus‐dependent place/context mem...
Saved in:
Published in | Hippocampus Vol. 25; no. 12; pp. 1517 - 1531 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1050-9631 1098-1063 1098-1063 |
DOI | 10.1002/hipo.22471 |
Cover
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Hippocampal lesions tend to facilitate two‐way active avoidance (2WAA) conditioning, where rats learn to cross to the opposite side of a conditioning chamber to avoid a tone‐signaled footshock. This classical finding has been suggested to reflect that hippocampus‐dependent place/context memory inhibits 2WAA (a crossing response to the opposite side is inhibited by the memory that this is the place where a shock was received on the previous trial). However, more recent research suggests other aspects of hippocampal function that may support 2WAA learning. More specifically, the ventral hippocampus has been shown to contribute to behavioral responses to aversive stimuli and to positively modulate the meso‐accumbens dopamine system, whose activation has been implicated in 2WAA learning. Permanent hippocampal lesions may not reveal these contributions because, following complete and permanent loss of hippocampal output, other brain regions may mediate these processes or because deficits could be masked by lesion‐induced extra‐hippocampal changes, including an upregulation of accumbal dopamine transmission. Here, we re‐examined the hippocampal role in 2WAA learning in Wistar rats, using permanent NMDA‐induced neurotoxic lesions and temporary functional inhibition by muscimol or tetrodotoxin (TTX) infusion. Complete hippocampal lesions tended to facilitate 2WAA learning, whereas ventral (VH) or dorsal hippocampal (DH) lesions had no effect. In contrast, VH or DH muscimol or TTX infusions impaired 2WAA learning. Ventral infusions caused an immediate impairment, whereas after dorsal infusions rats showed intact 2WAA learning for 40–50 min, before a marked deficit emerged. These data show that functional inhibition of ventral hippocampus disrupts 2WAA learning, while the delayed impairment following dorsal infusions may reflect the time required for drug diffusion to ventral hippocampus. Overall, using temporary functional inhibition, our study shows that the ventral hippocampus contributes to 2WAA learning. Permanent lesions may not reveal these contributions due to functional compensation and extra‐hippocampal lesion effects. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich ArticleID:HIPO22471 istex:F729B969204939E4174156C9DFA60B784775F40C JiangSu University, JiangSu province, China - No. BL2014068, 2012M521019, Nr. 13JDG001, 11JDG112, NSFC Nr. 31201346 ark:/67375/WNG-15HDNRTZ-5 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1050-9631 1098-1063 1098-1063 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hipo.22471 |