Surface electromyography of jaw muscles and kinesiographic recordings: diagnostic accuracy for myofascial pain

• Published in: Journal of oral rehabilitation Vol. 38; no. 11; pp. 791 - 799
• Main Authors: MANFREDINI, D., COCILOVO, F., FAVERO, L., FERRONATO, G., TONELLO, S., GUARDA-NARDINI, L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2011
• Subjects: Adult; Case-Control Studies; electromyography; Electromyography - methods; Facial Pain - diagnosis; Facial Pain - physiopathology; Female; Humans; kinesiography; Male; Masseter Muscle - physiopathology; Musculoskeletal Pain - diagnosis; Musculoskeletal Pain - physiopathology; myofascial pain; Range of Motion, Articular; Reproducibility of Results; research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders; surface electromyography; Temporal Muscle - physiopathology; temporomandibular disorders; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - diagnosis; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders - physiopathology
• ISSN: 0305-182X; 1365-2842; 1365-2842
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02218.x

Summary  The present investigations attempted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of commercially available surface electromyography (sEMG) and kinesiography (KG) devices for myofascial pain of jaw muscles. Thirty‐six (n = 36) consecutive patients with a research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) axis I diagnosis of myofascial pain and an age‐ and sex‐matched group of 36 TMD‐free asymptomatic subjects underwent sEMG and KG assessments to compare EMG parameters of the masseter and temporalis muscles as well as the jaw range of motion and the interarch freeway space. EMG data at rest were not significantly different between myofascial pain patients and asymptomatic subjects, while the latter achieved significantly higher levels of EMG activity during clenching tasks. Symmetry of muscle activity at rest and during clenching tasks, KG parameters of jaw range of motion and the measurement of the interarch vertical freeway did not differ between groups. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed that, except EMG parameters during clenching tasks, all the other outcome sEMG and KG measures did not reach acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity, with a 30·6–88·9% percentage of false‐positive results. Therefore, clinicians should not use sEMG and KG devices as diagnostic tools for individual patients who might have myofascial pain in the jaw muscles. Whether intended as a stand‐alone measurement or as an adjunct to making clinical decisions, such instruments do not meet the standard of reliability and validity required for such usage.