Undercover Acolytes: Honganji, the Japanese Army, and Intelligence-Gathering Operations

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, as the Japanese Army sought intelligence on the countries neighbouring Japan, the military made use of the Buddhist priesthood as a cover for intelligence gathering. In addition, elements of the Buddhist priesthood, in particular the Kyoto‐based Ho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of religious history Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 185 - 205
Main Author Boyd, James
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2013
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-4227
1467-9809
DOI10.1111/1467-9809.12027

Cover

More Information
Summary:In the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, as the Japanese Army sought intelligence on the countries neighbouring Japan, the military made use of the Buddhist priesthood as a cover for intelligence gathering. In addition, elements of the Buddhist priesthood, in particular the Kyoto‐based Honganji sect, were happy to cooperate with the military in its intelligence gathering operations, either by allowing military officers to disguise themselves as monks or by having Buddhist monks gather military intelligence for the Japanese Army. This article examines the relationship between the Japanese Army and the Honganji sect following the 1868 Meiji Restoration, the activities of military officers who disguised themselves as Buddhist monks and the intelligence gathering activities of Buddhist monks, hoping to shed more light on the part that Japanese Buddhism played in Japan's imperial adventures.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JORH12027
The author would like to thank Tamara Dent and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions on an early version of the article and to thank Michelle Hall, Mayumi Shinozaki, and Michael Stone for help locating a number of the sources used in the article.
istex:6EF80D92761EC426C18E26C3976166CD7E62A5CC
ark:/67375/WNG-ZW3H65JR-J
Journal of Religious History, v.37, no.2, June 2013: 185-205
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0022-4227
1467-9809
DOI:10.1111/1467-9809.12027