FPGA-Based Simulated Bifurcation Machine

Since many combinatorial optimization problems can be mapped onto ground-state search problems of Ising models, special-purpose machines for Ising problems have attracted intense attention. Simulated bifurcation (SB) is a recently proposed algorithm to solve these Ising problems. One of the remarkab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Conference on Field-programmable Logic and Applications pp. 59 - 66
Main Authors Tatsumura, Kosuke, Dixon, Alexander R., Goto, Hayato
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.09.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1946-1488
DOI10.1109/FPL.2019.00019

Cover

More Information
Summary:Since many combinatorial optimization problems can be mapped onto ground-state search problems of Ising models, special-purpose machines for Ising problems have attracted intense attention. Simulated bifurcation (SB) is a recently proposed algorithm to solve these Ising problems. One of the remarkable features of SB is the high-degree parallelism underlying in the algorithm, providing an opportunity to solve the Ising problems very fast by massively parallel processing. In this work, we implement the SB algorithm on FPGAs by designing massively parallel custom circuits. We then compare the FPGA-based SB machines with a state-of-the-art machine called a coherent Ising machine (CIM), a highly optimized implementation of simulated annealing (SA), and GPU-based SB machines. SB machines with spin size of 2,048/4,096 (2K/4K) on an Arria10 GX1150 FPGA have 8,192 processing elements for the matrix-vector multiplication (MM) modules (the most computationally intensive part) and achieve computation throughput of 1,873/2,027 GMAC/s for the MM modules, outperforming 2K/4K SB machines on an Nvidia Tesla V100 GPU (113/183 GMAC/s). The 2K FPGA-SB solves all-to-all connected 2000-node MAX-CUT problem 14X (/124X) faster than the CIM (/the highly-optimized SA), with much better energy efficiency (288X better than the CIM).
ISSN:1946-1488
DOI:10.1109/FPL.2019.00019