Melanoma detection algorithm based on feature fusion
A Computer Aided-Diagnosis (CAD) System for melanoma diagnosis usually makes use of different types of features to characterize the lesions. The features are often combined into a single vector that can belong to a high dimensional space (early fusion). However, it is not clear if this is the optima...
Saved in:
| Published in | 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) Vol. 2015; pp. 2653 - 2656 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Conference Proceeding Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
IEEE
01.08.2015
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1094-687X 1557-170X |
| DOI | 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318937 |
Cover
| Summary: | A Computer Aided-Diagnosis (CAD) System for melanoma diagnosis usually makes use of different types of features to characterize the lesions. The features are often combined into a single vector that can belong to a high dimensional space (early fusion). However, it is not clear if this is the optimal strategy and works on other fields have shown that early fusion has some limitations. In this work, we address this issue and investigate which is the best approach to combine different features comparing early and late fusion. Experiments carried on the datasets PH2 (single source) and EDRA (multi source) show that late fusion performs better, leading to classification scores of Sensitivity = 98% and Specificity = 90% (PH 2 ) and Sensitivity = 83% and Specificity = 76% (EDRA). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1094-687X 1557-170X |
| DOI: | 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318937 |