Accelerating recurrent neural networks in analytics servers: Comparison of FPGA, CPU, GPU, and ASIC
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) provide state-of-the-art accuracy for performing analytics on datasets with sequence (e.g., language model). This paper studied a state-of-the-art RNN variant, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). We first proposed memoization optimization to avoid 3 out of the 6 dense matrix...
Saved in:
Published in | International Conference on Field-programmable Logic and Applications pp. 1 - 4 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
EPFL
01.08.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1946-1488 |
DOI | 10.1109/FPL.2016.7577314 |
Cover
Summary: | Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) provide state-of-the-art accuracy for performing analytics on datasets with sequence (e.g., language model). This paper studied a state-of-the-art RNN variant, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). We first proposed memoization optimization to avoid 3 out of the 6 dense matrix vector multiplications (SGEMVs) that are the majority of the computation in GRU. Then, we study the opportunities to accelerate the remaining SGEMVs using FPGAs, in comparison to 14-nm ASIC, GPU, and multi-core CPU. Results show that FPGA provides superior performance/Watt over CPU and GPU because FPGA's on-chip BRAMs, hard DSPs, and reconfigurable fabric allow for efficiently extracting fine-grained parallelisms from small/medium size matrices used by GRU. Moreover, newer FPGAs with more DSPs, on-chip BRAMs, and higher frequency have the potential to narrow the FPGA-ASIC efficiency gap. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1946-1488 |
DOI: | 10.1109/FPL.2016.7577314 |