Accelerating recurrent neural networks in analytics servers: Comparison of FPGA, CPU, GPU, and ASIC

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) provide state-of-the-art accuracy for performing analytics on datasets with sequence (e.g., language model). This paper studied a state-of-the-art RNN variant, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). We first proposed memoization optimization to avoid 3 out of the 6 dense matrix...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Conference on Field-programmable Logic and Applications pp. 1 - 4
Main Authors Nurvitadhi, Eriko, Jaewoong Sim, Sheffield, David, Mishra, Asit, Krishnan, Srivatsan, Marr, Debbie
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published EPFL 01.08.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1946-1488
DOI10.1109/FPL.2016.7577314

Cover

More Information
Summary:Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) provide state-of-the-art accuracy for performing analytics on datasets with sequence (e.g., language model). This paper studied a state-of-the-art RNN variant, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). We first proposed memoization optimization to avoid 3 out of the 6 dense matrix vector multiplications (SGEMVs) that are the majority of the computation in GRU. Then, we study the opportunities to accelerate the remaining SGEMVs using FPGAs, in comparison to 14-nm ASIC, GPU, and multi-core CPU. Results show that FPGA provides superior performance/Watt over CPU and GPU because FPGA's on-chip BRAMs, hard DSPs, and reconfigurable fabric allow for efficiently extracting fine-grained parallelisms from small/medium size matrices used by GRU. Moreover, newer FPGAs with more DSPs, on-chip BRAMs, and higher frequency have the potential to narrow the FPGA-ASIC efficiency gap.
ISSN:1946-1488
DOI:10.1109/FPL.2016.7577314