Single trial recognition of anticipatory slow cortical potentials: The role of spatio-spectral filtering

Single trial recognition of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) from full-band EEG (FbEEG) faces different challenges to classical EEG such as noisy, high magnitude (~ ±100 μV) infra slow oscillations (ISO) with f ≤ 0.1 Hz and high frequency spatial noise from a variety of artifacts. We analyze offline...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering pp. 408 - 411
Main Authors Garipelli, G., Chavarriaga, R., del R Millan, J.
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.04.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN9781424441402
1424441404
ISSN1948-3546
DOI10.1109/NER.2011.5910573

Cover

More Information
Summary:Single trial recognition of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) from full-band EEG (FbEEG) faces different challenges to classical EEG such as noisy, high magnitude (~ ±100 μV) infra slow oscillations (ISO) with f ≤ 0.1 Hz and high frequency spatial noise from a variety of artifacts. We analyze offline the anticipation related SCPs recorded from 11 subjects over two days in a variation of the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) paradigm with Go and No-go conditions in an assistive technology framework. The results suggest that widely used spatial filters such as Common Average Referencing (CAR) and Laplacian are sub-optimal for the single trial analysis of SCPs. We show that a spatial smoothing filter (SSF), which in combination with CAR enhances the spatially distributed SCP while attenuating high frequency spatial noise. We report, first, that a narrow band filter in the range [0.1 1] Hz captures anticipation related SCP better and effectively reduces ISOs. Second, the SSF in combination with CAR outperforms CAR-alone and Laplacian spatial filters. Third, we compare linear and quadratic classifiers calculated using optimally filtered Cz electrode potentials and report that the best methods resulted in single trial classification accuracies of 83 ±4%, where classifiers were trained on day 1 and tested using data from day 2, to ensure generalization capabilities across days (1-7 days).
ISBN:9781424441402
1424441404
ISSN:1948-3546
DOI:10.1109/NER.2011.5910573